Telescopes look up in the market on that morning, and
bear a monstrous premium; for they cheat, probably,
in those scientific worlds as well as we do.
How, then, if it be announced in some such telescopic
world by those who make a livelihood of catching glimpses
at our newspapers, whose language they have long since
deciphered, that the poor victim in the morning’s
sacrifice is a woman? How, if it be published
on that distant world that the sufferer wears upon
her head, in the eyes of many, the garlands of martyrdom?
How, if it should be some Marie Antoinette, the widowed
queen, coming forward on the scaffold, and presenting
to the morning air her head, turned gray prematurely
by sorrow, daughter of Caesars kneeling down humbly
to kiss the guillotine, as one that worships death?
How, if it were the “martyred wife of Roland,”
uttering impassioned truth—truth odious
to the rulers of her country—with her expiring
breath? How, if it were the noble Charlotte Corday,
that in the bloom of youth, that with the loveliest
of persons, that with homage waiting upon her smiles
wherever she turned her face to scatter them—homage
that followed those smiles as surely as the carols
of birds, after showers in spring, follow the re-appearing
sun and the racing of sunbeams over the hills—yet
thought all these things cheaper than the dust upon
her sandals in comparison of deliverance from hell
for her dear suffering France? Ah! these were
spectacles indeed for those sympathizing people in
distant worlds; and some, perhaps, would suffer a
sort of martyrdom themselves, because they could not
testify their wrath, could not bear witness to the
strength of love, and to the fury of hatred, that burned
within them at such scenes; could not gather into
golden urns some of that glorious dust which rested
in the catacombs of earth.
On the Wednesday after Trinity Sunday in 1431, being
then about nineteen years of age, the Maid of Arc
underwent her martyrdom. She was conducted before
mid-day, guarded by eight hundred spearmen, to a platform
of prodigious height, constructed of wooden billets
supported by occasional walls of lath and plaster,
and traversed by hollow spaces in every direction
for the creation of air-currents. The pile “struck
terror,” says M. Michelet, “by its height;”
and, as usual, the English purpose in this is viewed
as one of pure malignity. But there are two ways
of explaining all that. It is probable that the
purpose was merciful. On the circumstances of
the execution I shall not linger. Yet, to mark
the almost fatal felicity of M. Michelet in finding
out whatever may injure the English name, at a moment
when every reader will be interested in Joanna’s
personal appearance, it is really edifying to notice
the ingenuity by which he draws into light from a
dark corner a very unjust account of it, and neglects,
though lying upon the high road, a very pleasing one.
Both are from English pens. Grafton, a chronicler
but little read, being a stiff-necked John Bull, thought