Pythagoreans, had returned to his native country to
endhis life as a pious hermit in a cavern of the “holy
mountain.” He remained accessible only
to the king and his servants, and gave forth to the
king and through him to the people his oracles with
reference to every important undertaking. He
was regarded by his countrymen at first as priest
of the supreme god and ultimately as himself a god,
just as it is said of Moses and Aaron that the Lord
had made Aaron the prophet and Moses the god of the
prophet. This had become a permanent institution;
there was regularly associated with the king of the
Getae such a god, from whose mouth everything which
the king ordered proceeded or appeared to proceed.
This peculiar constitution, in which the theocratic
idea had become subservient to the apparently absolute
power of the king, probably gave to the kings of the
Getae some such position with respect to their subjects
as the caliphs had with respect to the Arabs; and
one result of it was the marvellous religious-political
reform of the nation, which was carried out about
this time by the king of the Getae, Burebistas, and
the god Dekaeneos. The people, which had morally
and politically fallen into utter decay through unexampled
drunkenness, was as it were metamorphosed by the new
gospel of temperance and valour; with his bands under
the influence, so to speak, of puritanic discipline
and enthusiasm king Burebistas founded within a few
years a mighty kingdom, which extended along both
banks of the Danube and reached southward far into
Thrace, Illyria, and Noricum. No direct contact
with the Romans had yet taken place, and no one could
tell what might come out of this singular state, which
reminds us of the early times of Islam; but this much
it needed no prophetic gift to foretell, that proconsuls
like Antonius and Piso were not called to contend with
gods.
CHAPTER VIII
The Joint Rule of Pompeius and Caesar
Pompeius and Caesar in Juxtaposition
Among the democratic chiefs, who from the time of
the consulate of Caesar were recognized officially,
so to speak, as the joint rulers of the commonwealth,
as the governing “triumvirs,” Pompeius
according to public opinion occupied decidedly the
first place. It was he who was called by the
Optimates the “private dictator”; it was
before him that Cicero prostrated himself in vain;
against him were directed the sharpest sarcasms in
the wall-placards of Bibulus, and the most envenomed
arrows of the talk in the saloons of the opposition.
This was only to be expected. According to
the facts before the public Pompeius was indisputably
the first general of his time; Caesar was a dexterous
party-leader and party-orator, of undeniable talents,
but as notoriously of unwarlike and indeed of effeminate
temperament. Such opinions had been long current;
it could not be expected of the rabble of quality that
it should trouble itself about the real state of things