insignia and probably therefore a similar plenitude of power with the Roman kings.  A strict line of demarcation separated the nobles from the common people.  The resemblance in the clan-organization is attested by the analogy of the system of names; only, among the Etruscans, descent on the mother’s side received much more consideration than in Roman law.  The constitution of their league appears to have been very lax.  It did not embrace the whole nation; the northern and the Campanian Etruscans were associated in confederacies of their own, just in the same way as the communities of Etruria proper.  Each of these leagues consisted of twelve communities, which recognized a metropolis, especially for purposes of worship, and a federal head or rather a high priest, but appear to have been substantially equal in respect of rights; while some of them at least were so powerful that neither could a hegemony establish itself, nor could the central authority attain consolidation.  In Etruria proper Volsinii was the metropolis; of the rest of its twelve towns we know by trustworthy tradition only Perusia, Vetulonium, Volci, and Tarquinii.  It was, however, quite as unusual for the Etruscans really to act in concert, as it was for the Latin confederacy to do otherwise.  Wars were ordinarily carried on by a single community, which endeavoured to interest in its cause such of its neighbours as it could; and when an exceptional case occurred in which war was resolved on by the league, individual towns very frequently kept aloof from it.  The Etruscan confederations appear to have been from the first—­still more than the other Italian leagues formed on a similar basis of national affinity—­deficient in a firm and paramount central authority.

Notes for Book I Chapter IX

1. -Ras-ennac-, with the gentile termination mentioned below.

2.  To this period belong e. g. inscriptions on the clay vases of

umaramlisia(—­“id:theta")ipurenaie(&mdash
;­“id:theta")eeraisieepanamine (—­“id:theta")unastavhelefu- or -mi ramu(—­“id:theta")af kaiufinaia-.

3.  We may form some idea of the sound which the language now had from the commencement of the great inscription of Perusia; -eulat tanna laresul ameva(—­“id:chi")r lautn vel(—­“id:theta")inase stlaafunas slele(—­“id:theta")caru-.

4.  Such as Maecenas, Porsena, Vivenna, Caecina, Spurinna.  The vowel in the penult is originally long, but in consequence of the throwing back of the accent upon the initial syllable is frequently shortened and even rejected.  Thus we find Porse(n)na as well as Porsena, and Ceicne as well as Caecina.

5.  I. VIII.  Umbro-Sabellian Migration

6.  I. VIII.  Their Political Development

7.  I. VIII.  Their Political Development

8.  I. IV.  Oldest Settlements in the Palatine and Suburan Regions

CHAPTER X