and to the urgent entreaty of his colleague and former
friend, that he would not obstruct the salvation of
Italy, he might reply that on that very question,
as to how Italy could be saved, opinions differed,
but that his constitutional right to use his veto against
the proposal of his colleague was beyond all doubt.
The senate now made an attempt to open up to Gracchus
a tolerable retreat; two consulars challenged him
to discuss the matter further in the senate house,
and the tribune entered into the scheme with zeal.
He sought to construe this proposal as implying that
the senate had conceded the principle of distributing
the domain-land; but neither was this implied in it,
nor was the senate at all disposed to yield in the
matter; the discussions ended without any result.
Constitutional means were exhausted. In earlier
times under such circumstances men were not indisposed
to let the proposal go to sleep for the current year,
and to take it up again in each succeeding one, till
the earnestness of the demand and the pressure of
public opinion overbore resistance. Now things
were carried with a higher hand. Gracchus seemed
to himself to have reached the point when he must
either wholly renounce his reform or begin a revolution.
He chose the latter course; for he came before the
burgesses with the declaration that either he or Octavius
must retire from the college, and suggested to Octavius
that a vote of the burgesses should be taken as to
which of them they wished to dismiss. Octavius
naturally refused to consent to this strange challenge;
the -intercessio- existed for the very purpose of
giving scope to such differences of opinion among colleagues.
Then Gracchus broke off the discussion with his colleague,
and turned to the assembled multitude with the question
whether a tribune of the people, who acted in opposition
to the people, had not forfeited his office; and the
assembly, long accustomed to assent to all proposals
presented to it, and for the most part composed of
the agricultural proletariate which had flocked in
from the country and was personally interested in
the carrying of the law, gave almost unanimously an
affirmative answer. Marcus Octavius was at the
bidding of Gracchus removed by the lictors from the
tribunes’ bench; and then, amidst universal
rejoicing, the agrarian law was carried and the first
allotment-commissioners were nominated. The votes
fell on the author of the law along with his brother
Gaius, who was only twenty years of age, and his father-in-law
Appius Claudius. Such a family-selection augmented
the exasperation of the aristocracy. When the
new magistrates applied as usual to the senate to obtain
the moneys for their equipment and for their daily
allowance, the former was refused, and a daily allowance
was assigned to them of 24 -asses-(1 shilling).
The feud spread daily more and more, and became more
envenomed and more personal. The difficult and
intricate task of defining, resuming, and distributing
the domains carried strife into every burgess-community,
and even into the allied Italian towns.