a crisis of fatal moment for the state. And all
this took place without any effort to visit it with
even a serious penalty in Rome. Not only did
the sympathies and rivalries of the different coteries
in the senate contribute to decide the filling up of
the most important places and the treatment of the
most momentous political questions; but even thus
early the money of foreign dynasts found its way to
the senators of Rome. Timarchus, the envoy of
Antiochus Epiphanes king of Syria (590), is mentioned
as the first who attempted with success to bribe the
Roman senate; the bestowal of presents from foreign
kings on influential senators soon became so common,
that surprise was excited when Scipio Aemilianus cast
into the military chest the gifts from the king of
Syria which reached him in camp before Numantia.
The ancient principle, that rule was its own sole
reward and that such rule was as much a duty and a
burden as a privilege and a benefit, was allowed to
fall wholly into abeyance. Thus there arose
the new state-economy, which turned its eyes away
from the taxation of the burgesses, but regarded the
body of subjects, on the other hand, as a profitable
possession of the community, which it partly worked
out for the public benefit, partly handed over to
be worked out by the burgesses. Not only was
free scope allowed with criminal indulgence to the
unscrupulous greed of the Roman merchant in the provincial
administration, but even the commercial rivals who
were disagreeable to him were cleared away by the
armies of the state, and the most glorious cities of
neighbouring lands were sacrificed, not to the barbarism
of the lust of power, but to the far more horrible
barbarism of speculation. By the ruin of the
earlier military organization, which certainly imposed
heavy burdens on the burgesses, the state, which was
solely dependent in the last resort on its military
superiority, undermined its own support. The
fleet was allowed to go to ruin; the system of land
warfare fell into the most incredible decay.
The duty of guarding the Asiatic and African frontiers
was devolved on the subjects; and what could not be
so devolved, such as the defence of the frontier in
Italy, Macedonia, and Spain, was managed after the
most wretched fashion. The better classes began
to disappear so much from the army, that it was already
difficult to raise the necessary number of officers
for the Spanish armies. The daily increasing
aversion to the Spanish war-service in particular,
combined with the partiality shown by the magistrates
in the levy, rendered it necessary in 602 to abandon
the old practice of leaving the selection of the requisite
number of soldiers from the men liable to serve to
the free discretion of the officers, and to substitute
for it the drawing lots on the part of all the men
liable to service—certainly not to the advantage
of the military esprit de corps, or of the warlike
efficiency of the individual divisions. The
authorities, instead of acting with vigour and sternness,