The History of Rome, Book III eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 707 pages of information about The History of Rome, Book III.

The History of Rome, Book III eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 707 pages of information about The History of Rome, Book III.

50.  III.  III.  The Celts Conquered by Rome

51.  III.  IX.  Conflicts and Peace with the Aetolians

52.  Besides Cato, we find the names of two “consulars and poets” belonging to this period (Sueton.  Vita Terent. 4)—­Quintus Labeo, consul in 571, and Marcus Popillius, consul in 581.  But it remains uncertain whether they published their poems.  Even in the case of Cato this may be doubted.

53.  II.  IX.  Roman Historical Composition

54.  III.  XII.  Irreligious Spirit

55.  III.  XII.  Irreligious Spirit

56.  The following fragments will give some idea of its tone.  Of Dido he says: 

-Blande et docte percontat—­Aeneas quo pacto Troiam urbem liquerit.-

Again of Amulius: 

-Manusque susum ad caelum—­sustulit suas rex Amulius; gratulatur—­divis-.

Part of a speech where the indirect construction is remarkable: 

-Sin illos deserant for—­tissumos virorum Magnum stuprum populo—­fieri per gentis-.

With reference to the landing at Malta in 498: 

-Transit Melitam Romanus—­insuiam integram Urit populatur vastat—­rem hostium concinnat.-

Lastly, as to the peace which terminated the war concerning Sicily: 

-Id quoque paciscunt moenia—­sint Lutatium quae
Reconcilient; captivos—­plurimos idem
Sicilienses paciscit—­obsides ut reddant.-

57.  That this oldest prose work on the history of Rome was composed in Greek, is established beyond a doubt by Dionys. i. 6, and Cicero, de Div. i. 21, 43.  The Latin Annals quoted under the same name by Quintilian and later grammarians remain involved in mystery, and the difficulty is increased by the circumstance, that there is also quoted under the same name a very detailed exposition of the pontifical law in the Latin language.  But the latter treatise will not be attributed by any one, who has traced the development of Roman literature in its connection, to an author of the age of the Hannibalic war; and even Latin annals from that age appear problematical, although it must remain a moot question whether there has been a confusion of the earlier with a later annalist, Quintus Fabius Maximus Servilianus (consul in 612), or whether there existed an old Latin edition of the Greek Annals of Fabius as well as of those of Acilius and Albinus, or whether there were two annalists of the name of Fabius Pictor.

The historical work likewise written in Greek, ascribed to Lucius Cincius Alimentus a contemporary of Fabius, seems spurious and a compilation of the Augustan age.

58.  Cato’s whole literary activity belonged to the period of his old age (Cicero, Cat. ii, 38; Nepos, Cato, 3); the composition even of the earlier books of the “Origines” falls not before, and yet probably not long subsequent to, 586 (Plin.  H. N. iii. 14, 114).

59.  It is evidently by way of contrast with Fabius that Polybius (xl. 6, 4) calls attention to the fact, that Albinus, madly fond of everything Greek, had given himself the trouble of writing history systematically [—­pragmatiken iotorian—­].

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
The History of Rome, Book III from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.