lost in oblivion; for it is in this field of research
alone that we acquire some idea of the breadth of
the gulf which separates our modes of thinking and
feeling from those of the civilized nations of antiquity.
Tradition, with its confused mass of national names
and its dim legends, resembles withered leaves which
with difficulty we recognize to have once been green.
Instead of threading that dreary maze and attempting
to classify those shreds of humanity, the Chones and
Oenotrians, the Siculi and the Pelasgi, it will be
more to the purpose to inquire how the real life of
the people in ancient Italy expressed itself in their
law, and their ideal life in religion; how they farmed
and how they traded; and whence the several nations
derived the art of writing and other elements of culture.
Scanty as our knowledge in this respect is in reference
to the Roman people and still more so in reference
to the Sabellians and Etruscans, even the slight and
very defective information which is attainable will
enable the mind to associate with these names some
more or less clear glimpse of the once living reality.
The chief result of such a view (as we may here mention
by way of anticipation) may be summed up in saying
that fewer traces comparatively of the primitive state
of things have been preserved in the case of the Italians,
and of the Romans in particular, than in the case of
any other Indo-Germanic race. The bow and arrow,
the war-chariot, the incapacity of women to hold property,
the acquiring of wives by purchase, the primitive
form of burial, blood-revenge, the clan-constitution
conflicting with the authority of the community, a
vivid natural symbolism —all these, and
numerous phenomena of a kindred character, must be
presumed to have lain at the foundation of civilization
in Italy as well as elsewhere; but at the epoch when
that civilization comes clearly into view they have
already wholly disappeared, and only the comparison
of kindred races informs us that such things once
existed. In this respect Italian history begins
at a far later stage of civilization than
e.g.
the Greek or the Germanic, and from the first it exhibits
a comparatively modern character.
The laws of most of the Italian stocks are lost in
oblivion. Some information regarding the law
of the Latin land alone has survived in Roman tradition.
Jurisdiction
All jurisdiction was vested in the community or, in
other words, in the king, who administered justice
or “command” (-ius-) on the “days
of utterance” (-dies fasti-) at the “judgment
platform” (-tribunal-) in the place of public
assembly, sitting on the “chariot-seat”
(-sella curulis-);(1) by his side stood his “messengers”
(-lictores-), and before him the person accused or
the “parties” (-rei-). No doubt
in the case of slaves the decision lay primarily with
the master, and in the case of women with the father,
husband, or nearest male relative;(2) but slaves and