[Footnote 1:  Journals, x. 13, 16, 17.]

[Footnote 2:  Whitelock, 261-264.  Leicester’s Journal, 27.  Baillie calls this surrender of the city “an example rarely paralleled, if not of treachery, yet at least of childish improvidence and base cowardice” (ii. 259).  The eleven members instantly fled.—­Leicester, ibid.]

[Sidenote a:  A.D. 1647.  August 5.] [Sidenote b:  A.D. 1647.  August 6.]

the members compulsory, and therefore null.  But in the lower house the Presbyterians and their adherents composed a more formidable body; and by their spirit and perseverance, though they could not always defeat, frequently embarrassed the designs of their opponents.  To many things they gave their assent; they suffered Maynard and Glyn, two members, to be expelled, the lord mayor, one of the sheriffs, and four of the aldermen, to be sent to the Tower, and the seven peers who sat during the secession of their colleagues, to be impeached.  But a sense of danger induced them to oppose a resolution sent from the Lords, to annul all the votes passed from the 20th of July to the 6th of August.  Four times,[a] contrary to the practice of the house, the resolution was brought forward, and as often, to the surprise of the Independents, was rejected.  Fairfax hastened to the aid of his friends.  In a letter to the speaker, he condemned the conduct of the Commons as equivalent to an approval of popular violence, and hinted the necessity of removing from the house the enemies of the public tranquillity.  The next morning[b] the subject was resumed:  the Presbyterians made the trial of their strength on an amendment, and finding themselves outnumbered, suffered the resolution to pass without a division.[1]

The submission of the citizens made a considerable change in the prospects of the captive monarch.  Had any opposition been offered, it was the intention of the officers (so we are told by Ashburnham) to have unfurled the royal standard, and to have placed Charles at their head.  The ease with which they had subdued their opponents convinced them of their own superiority

[Footnote 1:  Journals, 375, 385, 388, 391-398.  Commons’, iv.  Aug. 9, 10, 17, 19, 20.]

[Sidenote a:  A.D. 1647.  August 9, 10, 17, 19.] [Sidenote b:  A.D. 1647.  August 20.]

and rendered the policy of restoring the King a more doubtful question.  Still they continued to treat him with respect and indulgence.  From Oatlands he was transferred[a] to the palace of Hampton Court.  There he was suffered to enjoy the company of his children, whenever he pleased to command their attendance, and the pleasure of hunting, on his promise not to attempt an escape; all persons whom he was content to see found ready admission to his presence; and, what he prized above all other concessions, he was furnished with the opportunity of corresponding freely and safely with the queen at Paris.[1] At the same time the two houses, at the requisition of the Scottish