to have governments corresponding to their national
needs and responsible to their own control, and to
build up, under the care and protection of those governments,
the social institutions and the civilisation of their
choice. So long as there are peoples in Europe
under alien governments, curtailed in the use of their
own language,[1] in the propagation of their literature
and ideas, in their social intercourse, in their corporate
life, in all that we in Great Britain understand by
civil liberty, so long will there be men who will
mock at the very idea of international peace, and
look forward to war, not as an outworn instrument
of a barbarous age, but as a means to national freedom
and self-expression. Englishmen sometimes forget
that there are worse evils than open war, both in
political and industrial relations, and that the political
causes for which their fathers fought and died have
still to be carried to victory on the Continent.
Nationality and their national institutions are the
very life-blood of English people. They are as
natural to them as the air they breathe. That
is what makes it sometimes so difficult for them to
understand, as the history of Ireland and even of Ulster
shows, what nationality means to other peoples.
And that is why they have not realised, not only that
there are peoples in Europe living under alien governments,
but that there are governments in Europe so foolish
as to think that men and women deprived of their national
institutions, humiliated in their deepest feelings,
and forced into an alien mould, can make good citizens,
trustworthy soldiers, or even obedient subjects.
[Footnote 1: The German official communique
on August 26, 1914, reports as follows: “All
the newspapers in Belgium, with the exception of those
in Antwerp, are printed in the German language.”
This, of course, is on the model of the Prussian administration
of Poland. The Magyars are more repressive even
than the Germans. See the bibliography given in
General Books below.]
The political causes of the present war, then, and
of the half century of Armed Peace which preceded
it are to be found, not in the particular schemes
and ambitions of any of the governments of Europe,
nor in their secret diplomacy, nor in the machinations
of the great armament interests allied to them, sinister
though all these may have been, but in the nature
of some of those governments themselves, and in their
relation to the peoples over whom they rule.
“If it were possible,” writes Prince Buellow,
who directed German policy as Imperial Chancellor
from 1900 to 1909, “for members of different
nationalities, with different language and customs,
and an intellectual life of a different kind, to live
side by side in one and the same State, without succumbing
to the temptation of each trying to force his own
nationality on the other, things on earth would look
a good deal more peaceful. But it is a law of
life and development in history that where two national