city as a free commercial port. Of course, from
a purely Southern Slav point of view, the fate of
the town of Trieste (as distinct from the district)
ought to be a matter of complete indifference, though
of course the extremists claim it. It is, however,
well to bear in mind that the inclusion of Trieste
in Italy’s tariff system would mean the speedy
economic ruin of a great and flourishing commercial
centre. Commercially, then, Trieste is unthinkable
save either as the port of Austria or as a
porto
franco under Italian suzerainty. So far as
Istria is concerned, there would be no insurmountable
difficulty in drawing a satisfactory frontier on ethnographical
lines; the western portions, including Capodistria,
Rovigno, and Pola, are overwhelmingly Italian, while
the interior of the little province and the eastern
shore (with Abbazia, Lovrana,
etc.) is as overwhelmingly
Slavonic (Croat and Slovene mixed). Any redistribution
of territory on the basis of nationality must therefore
inevitably assign western Istria to Italy, and no reasonable
Southern Slav would raise any valid objection.
Once more the essential fact to consider is that the
acquisition of Trieste and Pola by Italy presupposes
the disappearance of Austria-Hungary; otherwise it
is not even remotely possible. Hence it is no
exaggeration to assert that the fate of Trieste is
one of the central issues in the whole European settlement.
Once make Trieste a free port, under the Italian flag,
and
ipso facto the Austro-Hungarian navy ceases
to exist, and with it all need for Italian naval activity
in the Adriatic. In other words, such a settlement
would lead to an almost idyllic reduction of naval
armaments in the Adriatic, since both Italy and the
new Jugoslavia could afford to restrict themselves
to a minimum of coast defence. It is obvious,
however, that the dismantlement of Pola—to-day
an almost impregnable fortress—would be
an essential condition to neighbourly relations between
the two, the more so since under such altered circumstances
an Italian naval base at Pola could only have one
objective.
There is an unfortunate tendency in Italy to misread
the whole situation on the eastern Adriatic, to ignore
the transformation which the revival of Southern Slav
consciousness has wrought in lands which once owned
the supremacy of Venice. A short-sighted distrust
of the Slav blinds many Italians to the double fact
that he has come to stay, and that his friendship
is to be had for the asking. The commercial future
of Dalmatia, Bosnia, and Serbia is intimately bound
up with Italy, and Italy herself will be the chief
loser if she closes her eyes to so patent a truth.
The fate of Trieste and Istria is a triangular issue
between Teuton, Slav, and Latin. The Italian,
if his claims are too ambitious or exacting, may succeed
in preventing the Slav from obtaining his share of
the spoils, but only by leaving them all in the hands
of a still more dangerous rival, in other words, by
a crude policy of dog-in-the-manger.