English becomes less usual, and in the course of the
twelfth century it goes out of use in favour of Latin.
There are no French documents till the thirteenth century,
and in that century English begins again. Instead
of abolishing the English tongue, William took care
that his English-born son should learn it, and he
even began to learn it himself. A king of those
days held it for his duty to hear and redress his subjects’
complaints; he had to go through the land and see for
himself that those who acted in his name did right
among his people. This earlier kings had done;
this William wished to do; but he found his ignorance
of English a hindrance. Cares of other kinds
checked his English studies, but he may have learned
enough to understand the meaning of his own English
charters. Nor did William try, as he is often
imagined to have done, to root out the ancient institutions
of England, and to set up in their stead either the
existing institutions of Normandy or some new institutions
of his own devising. The truth is that with
William began a gradual change in the laws and customs
of England, undoubtedly great, but far less than is
commonly thought. French names have often supplanted
English, and have made the amount of change seem greater
than it really was. Still much change did follow
on the Norman Conquest, and the Norman Conquest was
so completely William’s own act that all that
came of it was in some sort his act also. But
these changes were mainly the gradual results of the
state of things which followed William’s coming;
they were but very slightly the results of any formal
acts of his. With a foreign king and foreigners
in all high places, much practical change could not
fail to follow, even where the letter of the law was
unchanged. Still the practical change was less
than if the letter of the law had been changed as
well. English law was administered by foreign
judges; the foreign grantees of William held English
land according to English law. The Norman had
no special position as a Norman; in every rank except
perhaps the very highest and the very lowest, he had
Englishmen to his fellows. All this helped to
give the Norman Conquest of England its peculiar character,
to give it an air of having swept away everything
English, while its real work was to turn strangers
into Englishmen. And that character was impressed
on William’s work by William himself. The
king claiming by legal right, but driven to assert
his right by the sword, was unlike both the foreign
king who comes in by peaceful succession and the foreign
king who comes in without even the pretext of law.
The Normans too, if born soldiers, were also born
lawyers, and no man was more deeply impressed with
the legal spirit than William himself. He loved
neither to change the law nor to transgress the law,
and he had little need to do either. He knew
how to make the law his instrument, and, without either
changing or transgressing it, to use it to make himself