I am in continual expectation of the arrival of the
other parties. I believe the eye-observations
and the ordinary photographs to be quite successful;
I doubt the advantage of the Janssen; one of the double-image-micrometers
seems to have failed; and the Zenith-telescope gives
some trouble. At three stations at Rodriguez,
and three at Kerguelen, the observations appear to
have been most successful. At the Sandwich Islands,
two of the stations appear to have been perfectly
successful (except that I fear that the Janssen has
failed), and a rich series of lunar observations for
longitude is obtained. At New Zealand, I grieve
to say, the observations were totally lost, entirely
in consequence of bad weather. There has been
little annoyance from the dreaded ‘black drop.’
Greater inconvenience and doubt have been caused by
the unexpected luminous ring round Venus.—With
regard to the progress of my proposed New Lunar Theory:
Three computers are now steadily employed on the work.
It will be remembered that the detail and mass of
this work are purely numerical; every numerical coefficient
being accompanied with a symbolical correction whose
value will sometimes depend on the time, but in every
case is ultimately to be obtained in a numerical form.
Of these coefficients, extracted (for convenience)
from Delaunay’s results, there are 100 for parallax,
182 for longitude, 142 for latitude; the arguments
being preserved in the usual form.”—After
reviewing the changes that had taken place at the
Observatory during the past forty years, the Report
to the Board of Visitors concludes thus: “I
much desire to see the system of time-signals extended,
by clocks or daily signals, to various parts of our
great cities and our dockyards, and above all by hourly
signals on the Start Point, which I believe would
be the greatest of all benefits to nautical chronometry.
Should any extension of our scientific work ever be
contemplated, I would remark that the Observatory
is not the place for new physical investigations.
It is well adapted for following out any which, originating
with private investigators, have been reduced to laws
susceptible of verification by daily observation.
The National Observatory will, I trust, always remain
on the site where it was first planted, and which
early acquired the name of ‘Flamsteed Hill.’
There are some inconveniences in the position, arising
principally from the limited extent of the hill, but
they are, in my opinion, very far overbalanced by
its advantages.”—In a letter on the
subject of the Smith’s Prizes Examination at
Cambridge, which was always a matter of the greatest
interest to him, Airy renewed his objections to the
preponderance in the Papers of a class of Pure Mathematics,
which he considered was never likely under any circumstances
to give the slightest assistance to Physics.
And, as before, these remarks called forth a rejoinder
from Prof. Cayley, who was responsible for many
of the questions of the class referred to.—In