can doubt this. The essence of love is sacrifice;
voluntary, nay eager sacrifice. Before our Blessed
Lord died He was mocked and ridiculed, He suffered
physical hardship, falling under the weight of the
cross, and He was lifted up, crucified, to suffer
the ignominious death of a felon. He was made
a spectacle for the jests and laughter of the multitude.
In our own time and amongst ourselves, except for
periods of war, there is little necessity for physical
suffering for our faith, but the need to endure ridicule
is as great as ever, perhaps even greater because
of the absence of physical suffering. Since we
are trying to apply these things in small and simple
ways to the individual life let us each one consider
how much moral courage it takes to defend Christian
virtues when they are sneered at under the guise of
“jokes.” Let us exercise charity by
not quoting instances, but let us be watchful of our
laughter and our fellowship, which are both gifts
of God, and see that we do not confuse pagan pleasure
with Christian joy, the evil sneer with the tender
recognition of the absurd in ourselves and in others.
It is Mr. Chesterton again who points out the fact
that the pagan virtues of justice and the like which
he calls the “sad virtues” were superseded,
when the great Christian revelation came, by the “gay
and exuberant virtues,” the virtues of grace,
faith, hope and charity; and who says, “the pagan
virtues are the reasonable virtues, and the Christian
virtues of faith, hope and charity are in their essence
as unreasonable as they can be. Charity means
pardoning what is unpardonable or it is no virtue at
all. Hope means hoping when things are hopeless
or it is no virtue at all. And faith means believing
the incredible or it is no virtue at all.”
If you say this is a paradox I reply: it must
be so, since it requires faith to accept a paradox.
The realm of reason is the one in which we walk by
sight, and of this fact our age in its pride of intellect
has need to be reminded. If Christ be not the
Son of God, and His revelation of the “faith
once delivered” be not the divine and final guide,
fulfilling, completing and at the same time reversing
every other ethic, religion and moral code, then these
things be indeed foolishness, for there is no explaining
them on the ground of logic or philosophy. But
if, by the gift of grace, we have faith, we remember
“I thank Thee, Father, that Thou hast hid these
things from the wise and prudent, and has revealed
them unto babes: even so, Father, for so it seemed
good in Thy sight.”
Again, and if as persons we are to grow in relationship to a personal God, we must both speak and listen to our Father; in other words we must use the great dynamic of prayer. “More things are wrought by prayer than this world dreams of.” We are told that one of the requisites of the really good talker is to be a good listener; the apparently good talker is in reality a monologuist. In our prayer-life today do we recognize sufficiently the need for listening