but I do not know how far any two of these are independent
testimonies. General Cunningham, however, fully
accepts the identity, and writes to me: “Fahian
(ch. xxiii.) calls the heretics who assembled at Ramagrama
Taosse,[12] thus identifying them with the Chinese
Finitimists. The Taosse are, therefore, the same
as the
Swastikas, or worshippers of the mystic
cross
Swasti, who are also
Tirthakaras,
or ‘Pure-doers.’ The synonymous word
Punya is probably the origin of
Pon or
Bon, the Tibetan Finitimists. From the
same word comes the Burmese
P’ungyi or
Pungi.” I may add that the Chinese
envoy to Cambodia in 1296, whose narrative Remusat
has translated, describes a sect which he encountered
there, apparently Brahminical, as
Taosse.
And even if the Bonpo and the Taosse were not fundamentally
identical, it is extremely probable that the Tibetan
and Mongol Buddhists should have applied to them one
name and character. Each played towards them
the same part in Tibet and in China respectively;
both were heretic sects and hated rivals; both made
high pretensions to asceticism and supernatural powers;
both, I think we see reason to believe, affected the
dark clothing which Polo assigns to the
Sensin;
both, we may add, had “great idols and plenty
of them.” We have seen in the account of
the Taosse the ground that certain of their ceremonies
afford for the allegation that they “sometimes
also worship fire,” whilst the whole account
of that rite and of others mentioned by Duhalde,[13]
shows what a powerful element of the old devil-dancing
Shamanism there is in their practice. The French
Jesuit, on the other hand, shows us what a prominent
place female divinities occupied in the Bon-po Pantheon,[14]
though we cannot say of either sect that “their
idols are all feminine.” A strong symptom
of relation between the two religions, by the way,
occurs in M. Durand’s account of the Bon Temple.
We see there that
Shen-rabs, the great doctor
of the sect, occupies a chief and central place among
the idols. Now in the Chinese temples of the Taosse
the figure of
their Doctor
Lao-tseu is
one member of the triad called the “Three Pure
Ones,” which constitute the chief objects of
worship. This very title recalls General Cunningham’s
etymology of Bonpo.
[Illustration: Tibetan Bacsi]
[At the quarterly fair (yueh kai) of Ta-li
(Yun-Nan), Mr. E. C. Baber (Travels, 158-159)
says: “A Fakir with a praying machine, which
he twirled for the salvation of the pious at the price
of a few cash, was at once recognised by us; he was
our old acquaintance, the Bakhsi, whose portrait is
given in Colonel Yule’s Marco Polo.”—H.
C.]
(Hodgson, in J. R. A. S. XVIII.
396 seqq.; Ann. de la Prop, de la Foi, XXXVI.
301-302, 424-427; E. Schlagintweit, Ueber die
Bon-pa Sekte in Tibet, in the Sitzensberichte
of the Munich Acad. for 1866, Heft I. pp. 1-12; Koeppen,
II. 260; Ladak, p. 358; J. As. ser.
II. tom. i. 411-412; Remusat. Nouv. Mel.
Asiat. I. 112; Astley, IV. 205; Doolittle,
191.)