clearly be held to represent a very considerable town.
There are no indications of the form of buildings,...
but simply large quantities of large bricks, which
for a long time have been carried away and used for
modern buildings.... After rain coins are found
on the surface.... There can be no doubt of a
very large extent of ground, of very irregular and
uninviting character, having been covered at some time
with buildings. The position on the Jelam would
answer well for the Dilawar which the Mongol invaders
took and held.... The strange thing is that the
name should not be mentioned (I believe it is not)
by any of the well-known Mahomedan historians of India.
So much for Dilawar.... The people have no traditions.
But there are the remains; and there is the name, borne
by the existing village on part of the old site.”
I had come to the conclusion that this was almost
certainly Polo’s Dalivar, and had mapped it as
such, before I read certain passages in the
History
of Ziyauddin Barni, which have been translated
by Professor Dowson for the third volume of Elliot’s
India. When the comrades of Ghaiassuddin
Balban urged him to conquests, the Sultan pointed
to the constant danger from the Mongols,[2] saying:
“These accursed wretches have heard of the wealth
and condition of Hindustan, and have set their hearts
upon conquering and plundering it.
They have taken
and plundered Lahor within my territories, and no year
passes that they do not come here and plunder the villages....
They even talk about the conquest and sack of Delhi.”
And under a later date the historian says: “The
Sultan... marched to Lahor, and ordered the rebuilding
of the fort which the Mughals had destroyed in the
reigns of the sons of Shamsuddin. The towns and
villages of Lahor which the Mughals had devastated
and laid waste he repeopled.” Considering
these passages, and the fact that Polo had no personal
knowledge of Upper India, I now think it probable
that Marsden was right, and that
Dilivar is
really a misunderstanding of “
Citta di
Livar” for
Lahawar or Lahore.
The Magical darkness which Marco ascribes to
the evil arts of the Karaunas is explained by Khanikoff
from the phenomenon of Dry Fog, which he has
often experienced in Khorasan, combined with the Dust
Storm with which we are familiar in Upper India.
In Sind these phenomena often produce a great degree
of darkness. During a battle fought between the
armies of Sindh and Kachh in 1762, such a fog came
on, obscuring the light of day for some six hours,
during which the armies were intermixed with one another
and fighting desperately. When the darkness dispersed
they separated, and the consternation of both parties
was so great at the events of the day that both made
a precipitate retreat. In 1844 this battle was
still spoken of with wonder. (J. Bomb.
Br. R. A. S. I. 423.)
Major St. John has given a note on his own experience
of these curious Kerman fogs (see Ocean Highways,
1872, p. 286): “Not a breath of air was
stirring, and the whole effect was most curious, and
utterly unlike any other fog I have seen. No
deposit of dust followed, and the feeling of the air
was decidedly damp. I unfortunately could not
get my hygrometer till the fog had cleared away.”