a problem of that very ingenious and studious promoter
of real knowledge, the learned and worthy Mr. Molineux,
which he was pleased to send me in a letter some months
since; and it is this:—“Suppose a
man
born blind, and now adult, and taught by
his
touch to distinguish between a cube and a
sphere of the same metal, and nighly of the same bigness,
so as to tell, when he felt one and the other, which
is the cube, which the sphere. Suppose then the
cube and sphere placed on a table, and the blind man
be made to see: quaere, whether
by his
sight,
before he touched them,
he could now distinguish and tell which is the globe,
which the cube?” To which the acute and judicious
proposer answers, “Not. For, though he has
obtained the experience of how a globe, how a cube
affects his touch, yet he has not yet obtained the
experience, that what affects his touch so or so, must
affect his sight so or so; or that a protuberant angle
in the cube, that pressed his hand unequally, shall
appear to his eye as it does in the cube.”—I
agree with this thinking gentleman, whom I am proud
to call my friend, in his answer to this problem;
and am of opinion that the blind man, at first sight,
would not be able with certainty to say which was
the globe, which the cube, whilst he only saw them;
though he could unerringly name them by his touch,
and certainly distinguish them by the difference of
their figures felt. This I have set down, and
leave with my reader, as an occasion for him to consider
how much he may be beholden to experience, improvement,
and acquired notions, where he thinks he had not the
least use of, or help from them. And the rather,
because this observing gentleman further adds, that
“having, upon the occasion of my book, proposed
this to divers very ingenious men, he hardly ever
met with one that at first gave the answer to it which
he thinks true, till by hearing his reasons they were
convinced.”
9. This judgement apt to be mistaken for direct
perception.
But this is not, I think, usual in any of our ideas,
but those received by sight. Because sight, the
most comprehensive of all our senses, conveying to
our minds the ideas of light and colours, which are
peculiar only to that sense; and also the far different
ideas of space, figure, and motion, the several varieties
whereof change the appearances of its proper object,
viz. light and colours; we bring ourselves by
use to judge of the one by the other. This, in
many cases by a settled habit,—in things
whereof we have frequent experience is performed so
constantly and so quick, that we take that for the
perception of our sensation which is an idea formed
by our judgment; so that one, viz. that of sensation,
serves only to excite the other, and is scarce taken
notice of itself;—as a man who reads or
hears with attention and understanding, takes little
notice of the characters or sounds, but of the ideas
that are excited in him by them.