‘Throughout the whole of this most trying time,’ writes Major Campbell,[8] ’Lord Elgin remained perfectly calm and cool; never for a moment losing his self-possession, nor failing to exercise that clear foresight and sound judgment for which he was so remarkable.  It came to the knowledge of his Ministers that, if he went into the city again, his life would be in great danger; and they advised that a commission should issue to appoint a Deputy-Governor for the purpose of proroguing Parliament.  He was urged by irresponsible advisers to make use of the military forces at his command, to protect his person in an official visit to the city; but he declined to do so, and thus avoided what these infatuated rioters seemed determined to bring on—­the shedding of blood.  “I am prepared,” he said, “to bear any amount of obloquy that may be cast upon me, but, if I can possibly prevent it, no stain of blood shall rest upon my name."’

As might have been expected, the Montreal press attributed this wise and magnanimous self-restraint to fear for his own safety.  But he was not to be moved from his resolve by the paltry imputation; nor did he even care that his friends should resent or refute it on his behalf.

So little was he affected by it that on finding, some years afterwards, that Lord Grey proposed to introduce some expression of indignation on the subject in his work on the colonies, he dissuaded him from doing so.  ’I do not believe,’ he said, ’that these imputations were hazarded in any respectable quarter, or that they are entitled to the dignity of a place in your narrative.’

[Sidenote:  or to yield to violence.]

But if neither the entreaties of ‘irresponsible advisers,’ nor the taunts of foes, could move him to the use of force, he was equally firm in his determination to concede nothing to the clamour and violence of the mob.  Writing officially to Lord Grey on the 30th of April, when the fury of the populace was at its height, he said:—­

It is my firm conviction that if this dictation be submitted to, the government of this province by constitutional means will be impossible, and that the struggle between overbearing minorities, backed by force, and majorities resting on legality and established forms, which has so long proved the bane of Canada, driving capital from the province, and producing a state of chronic discontent, will be perpetuated.

[Sidenote:  Tenders resignation.]

At the same time, he thought it his duty to suggest, that ’if he should be unable to recover that position of dignified neutrality between contending parties which it had been his unremitting study to maintain,’ it might be a question whether it would not be for the interests of Her Majesty’s service that he should be removed, to make way for some one ’who should have the advantage of being personally unobnoxious to any section of Her Majesty’s subjects within the province.’