[1] Our Colonies: an Address delivered
to the members of the
Mechanics’ Institute,
Chester, Nov. 12, 1855, by the Right Hon. W. E.
Gladstone, M.P.
[2] See the Colonial Policy of Lord John Russell’s
Administration, by
Earl Grey: a work in
which the records of a most important period of
colonial history are traced
with equal ability and authority.
[3] MacMullen’s History of Canada, p. 497.
[4] Lord Grey’s Colonial Policy, &c., i. 207.
[5] MacMullen’s History of Canada.
[6] A pamphlet was published by a member of the Legislative
Council,
denouncing this and similar
instances of ’horrible and heartless
conduct’ on the part
of landed proprietors and their ’mercenary
agents;’ but it was
proved by satisfactory evidence that his main
statements were not founded
in fact.
[7] Lord Grey’s Colonial policy.
[8] See Papers presented to Parliament, May, 1848;
or Lord Grey’s
Colonial Policy, i.
216.
[9] I.e. Member of the Provincial Parliament.
[10] Lord Grey’s Colonial Policy, i.
220. Lord Grey was one of the
few statesmen who were blameless
in the matter, for he voted against
the Act of 1843, in opposition
to his party.
[11] The personal annoyance which he felt on this
occasion was only a phase
of the indignation which was
often roused in him, by seeing the
interests and feelings of
the colony made the sport of party-speakers
and party-writers at home;
and important transactions in the province
distorted and misrepresented,
so as to afford ground for an attack, in
the British Parliament, on
an obnoxious Minister.—Vide Infra,
p. 113.
[12] ‘A knowledge’ wrote Sir F. Bruce,
’of what he was, and of the results
he in consequence achieved,
would be an admirable text on which to
engraft ideas of permanent
value on this most important question;’ as
helping to show ’that
to reduce education to stuffing the mind with
facts is to dwarf the intelligence,
and to reverse the natural process
of the growth of man’s
mind; that the knowledge of principles, as the
means of discrimination, and
the criterion of those individual
appreciations which are fallaciously
called facts, ought to be the end
of high education.’
CHAPTER IV.
CANADA.
DISCONTENT—REBELLION LOSSES BILL—OPPOSITION
TO IT—NEUTRALITY OF THE
GOVERNOR—RIOTS AT MONTREAL—FIRMNESS
OF THE GOVERNOR—APPROVAL OF HOME
GOVERNMENT—FRESH RIOTS—REMOVAL
OF SEAT OF GOVERNMENT FROM
MONTREAL—FORBEARANCE OF LORD ELGIN—RETROSPECT.