and herself as bound to extend what one of themselves
calls a maternal care and kindness to them, restraining
as far as she could, and when she could not restrain,
reproving their boyish excesses, softening their hearts
and winning their affections by the gentle dignity
of her admonitions, and by the condescending and hopeful
indulgence with which she accepted their expressions
of contrition and their promises of amendment.
In one matter, too, which, if not exactly political,
was at all events of public interest, she acted in
a manner of which none of her predecessors had set
an example. By a custom of immemorial antiquity,
at the accession of a new sovereign, a tax had been
levied on the whole kingdom as an offering to the
king, known as “the gift of the happy accession;[11]”
when there was a queen, a similar tax was imposed
upon the Parisians, to provide what was called “the
girdle of the queen.[12]” It has already been
mentioned that the distress which existed in Paris
at this time was so severe that, just before the death
of the late king, Louis and Marie Antoinette had relieved
it by a munificent gift from their private purse; and
to lay additional burdens on the people at such a
time was not only repugnant to their feelings, but
seemed especially inconsistent with their recent generosity.
Accordingly, the very first edict of the new reign
announced that neither tax would be imposed.
The people felt the kindness which dictated such a
relief more than even the relief itself, and repaid
it with expressions of gratitude such as no French
sovereign had heard for above a century; but Marie
Antoinette, with the humility natural to her on such
subjects, made light of her own share in the act of
benevolence, turning off the compliments which were
paid to her with a playful jest, that it was impossible
for a queen to affix a purse to her girdle, now that
girdles had gone out of fashion.[13]
On another subject, also, not wholly unconnected with
politics, Since the nobleman concerned had once been
the chief minister, but in which Marie Antoinette’s
interest was personal, she broke through her usual
rule of not beginning the discussion with the king,
and requested the recall from banishment of the Due
de Choiseul. An unfounded prejudice based upon
calumnies set on foot by the cabal of Madame du Barri,
had envenomed Louis’s mind against the duke.
He bad been led to suspect that his own father, the
late dauphin, had been poisoned, and that Choiseul
had been accessory to the crime. There was nothing
more certain than that the dauphin’s death had
been natural; but a dislike of the accused duke lingered
in the king’s mind, and he eluded compliance
with his wife’s request till she put it on entirely
personal grounds, by declaring it to be humiliating
to herself that one to whom she was under the deepest
obligations as the negotiator of her own happy marriage
should be under the king’s displeasure without
her being able to procure his pardon. Louis felt