of his commission was wholly unsuspected by the young
princess; but the count discharged such portions of
the delicate duty thus imposed upon him with rare
discretion, contriving in its performance to combine
the strictest fidelity to his imperial mistress with
the most entire devotion to the interests of his pupil,
and to preserve the unqualified regard and esteem
of both mother and daughter to the end of their lives.
Toward the latter, as dauphiness, and even as queen,
he stood for some years in a position very similar
to that which Baron Stockmar fills in the history of
the late Prince Consort of England, being, however,
more frequent in his admonitions, and occasionally
more severe in his reproofs, as the youth and inexperience
of Marie Antoinette not unnaturally led her into greater
mistakes than the scrupulous conscientiousness and
almost premature prudence of the prince consort ever
suffered him to commit; and his diligent reports to
the Empress-queen, amounting at times to a diary of
the proceedings of the French court, have a lasting
and inestimable value, since they furnish us with
so trustworthy a record of the whole life of Marie
Antoinette for the first ten years of her residence
in France,[5] of her actions, her language, and her
very thoughts (for she ever scorned to give a reason
or to make an excuse which was not absolutely and strictly
true), that there is perhaps no person of historical
importance whose conduct in every transaction of gravity
or interest is more minutely known, or whose character
there are fuller materials for appreciating.
The very day of her marriage did not pass without
her receiving a strange specimen of the factious spirit
which prevailed at the court, and of the hollowness
of the welcome with which the chief nobles had greeted
her arrival. A state ball was given at the palace
to celebrate the wedding, and as the Princess of Lorraine,
a cousin of the Emperor Francis, was the only blood-relation
of Marie Antoinette who was at Versailles at the time,
the king assigned her a place in the first quadrille,
giving her precedence for that occasion, next to the
princes of the blood. It did not seem a great
stretch of courtesy to show to a foreigner, even had
she not been related to the princess in whose honor
the ball was given; but the dukes and peers fired
up at the arrangement, as if an insult had been offered
them. They held a meeting at which they resolved
that no member of their families should attend, and
carried out their resolution so obstinately that at
five o’clock, when the dancing was to commence,
except the royal princesses there were only three
ladies in the room. The king, who, following
the example of Louis xiv., acted on these occasions
as his own master of ceremonies, was forced to send
special and personal orders to some of those who had
absented themselves to attend without delay. And
so by seven o’clock twelve or fourteen couples
were collected[6] (the number of persons admitted
to such entertainments was always extremely small),
and the rude disloyalty of the protest was to outward
appearance effaced by the submission of the recusants.