She had not yet entirely given up her desire for novelty in her amusements; and she began now to establish private theatricals at Versailles, choosing light comedies interspersed with song, and with but few characters, the male parts being filled by the Count d’Artois and some of the most distinguished officers of the household, while she herself took one of the female parts; the spectators being confined to the royal family and those nobles whose posts entitled them to immediate attendance on the king and queen.  She was so anxious to perform her own part well, though she did not take any of the principal characters, but preferred to act the waiting-woman rather than the mistress, that she placed herself under the tuition of Michu, a professional actor of reputation from one of the Parisian theatres; but, though the audience was far too courtly to greet her appearance on the stage without vociferous applause, the preponderance of evidence must lead us to believe that her majesty was not a good actress.[1] And perhaps we may think that as the parts which she selected required rather an arch pertness than the grace and majesty which were more natural to her, so, also, they were not altogether in keeping with the stately dignity which queens should never wholly lay aside.

It was well, however, that she should have amusements to cheer her, for the year was destined to bring her heavy troubles before its close:  losses in her own family, which would be felt with terrible heaviness by her affectionate disposition, were impending over her; while the news from America, where the English army at this time was achieving triumphs which seemed likely to have a decisive influence on the result of the war, caused her great anxiety.  How great, a letter which she wrote to her mother in July affords a striking proof.  In June, when she heard of the dangerous illness of her uncle, Prince Charles of Lorraine, now Governor of the Low Countries, formerly the gallant antagonist of Frederick of Prussia, she declared that “the intelligence overwhelmed her with an agitation and grief such as she had never before experienced,” and she lamented with evidently deep and genuine distress the threatened extinction of the male line of the house of Lorraine.  But before she wrote again, the news of Sir Henry Clinton’s exploits in Carolina had arrived, and, though almost the same post informed her of the prince’s death, the sorrow which that bereavement awakened in her mind was scarcely allowed, even in its first freshness, an equal share of her lamentations with the more absorbing importance of the events of the campaign beyond the Atlantic.

“MY DEAREST MOTHER,—­I wrote to you the moment that I received the sad intelligence of my uncle’s death; though, as the Brussels courier had already started, I fear my letter may have arrived rather late.  I will not venture to say more on the subject, lest I should be reopening a sorrow for which you have so much cause to grieve....  The capture of Charleston[2] is a most disastrous event, both for the facilities it will afford the English and for the encouragement which it will give to their pride.  It is perhaps still more serious because of the miserable defense made by the Americans.  One can hope nothing from such bad troops.”