dress, it is known to most people who pretend to be
cultivated, yet it is not more read than the “Paradise
Lost” or the “Faerie Queene,” being
too deep and learned for some, and understood by nobody
without a tolerable acquaintance with the Middle Ages,
which it interprets,—the superstitions,
the loves, the hatreds, the ideas of ages which can
never more return. All I can do—all
that is safe for me to attempt—is to show
the circumstances and conditions in which it was written,
the sentiments which prompted it, its historical results,
its general scope and end, and whatever makes its
author stand out to us as a living man, bearing the
sorrows and revelling in the joys of that high life
which gave to him extraordinary moral wisdom, and made
him a prophet and teacher to all generations.
He was a man of sorrows, of resentments, fierce and
implacable, but whose “love was as transcendent
as his scorn,”—a man of vast experiences
and intense convictions and superhuman earnestness,
despising the world which he sought to elevate, living
isolated in the midst of society, a wanderer and a
sage, meditating constantly on the grandest themes,
lost in ecstatic reveries, familiar with abstruse
theories, versed in all the wisdom of his day and
in the history of the past, a believer in God and immortality,
in rewards and punishments, and perpetually soaring
to comprehend the mysteries of existence, and those
ennobling truths which constitute the joy and the
hope of renovated and emancipated and glorified spirits
in the realms of eternal bliss. All this is history,
and it is history alone which I seek to teach,—the
outward life of a great man, with glimpses, if I can,
of those visions of beauty and truth in which his
soul lived, and which visions and experiences constitute
his peculiar greatness. Dante was not so close
an observer of human nature as Shakspeare, nor so
great a painter of human actions as Homer, nor so
learned a scholar as Milton; but his soul was more
serious than either,—he was deeper, more
intense than they; while in pathos, in earnestness,
and in fiery emphasis he has been surpassed only by
Hebrew poets and prophets.
It would seem from his numerous biographies that he
was remarkable from a boy; that he was a youthful
prodigy; that he was precocious, like Cicero and Pascal;
that he early made great attainments, giving utterance
to living thoughts and feelings, like Bacon, among
boyish companions; lisping in numbers, like Pope,
before he could write prose; different from all other
boys, since no time can be fixed when he did not think
and feel like a person of maturer years. Born
in Florence, of the noble family of the Alighieri,
in the year 1265, his early education devolved upon
his mother, his father having died while the boy was
very young. His mother’s friend, Brunetto
Latini, famous as statesman and scholarly poet, was
of great assistance in directing his tastes and studies.
As a mere youth he wrote sonnets, such as Sordello