might have done, had their piety taken a more practical
form! What missionaries they might have made,
what self-denying laborers in the field of active
philanthropy, what noble teachers to the poor and miserable!
The conversion of the world to Christianity did not
enter into their minds so much as the desire to swell
the number of their communities. They only aimed
at a dreamy pietism,—at best their own individual
salvation, rather than the salvation of others.
Instead of reaching to the beatific vision, they became
ignorant, narrow, and visionary; and, when learned,
they fought for words and not for things. They
were advocates of subtile and metaphysical distinctions
in theology, rather than of those practical duties
and simple faith which primitive Christianity enjoined.
Monastic life, no less than the schools of Alexandria,
was influential in creating a divinity which gave
as great authority to dogmas that are the result of
intellectual deductions, as those based on direct and
original declarations. And these deductions were
often gloomy, and colored by the fears which were
inseparable from a belief in divine wrath rather than
divine love. The genius of monasticism, ancient
and modern, is the propitiation of the Divinity who
seeks to punish rather than to forgive. It invented
Purgatory, to escape the awful burnings of an everlasting
hell of physical sufferings. It pervaded the whole
theology of the Middle Ages, filling hamlet and convent
alike with an atmosphere of fear and wrath, and creating
a cruel spiritual despotism. The recluse, isolated
and lonely, consumed himself with phantoms, fancied
devils, and “chimeras dire.” He could
not escape from himself, although he might fly from
society. As a means of grace he sought voluntary
solitary confinement, without nutritious food or proper
protection from the heat and cold, clad in a sheepskin
filled with dirt and vermin. What life could
be more antagonistic to enlightened reason? What
mistake more fatal to everything like self-improvement,
culture, knowledge, happiness? And all for what?
To strive after an impossible perfection, or the solution
of insoluble questions, or the favor of a Deity whose
attributes he misunderstood.
But this unnatural, unwise retirement was not the
worst evil in the life of a primitive monk, with all
its dreamy contemplation and silent despair.
It was accompanied with the most painful austerities,—self-inflicted
scourgings, lacerations, dire privations, to propitiate
an angry deity, or to bring the body into a state
which would be insensible to pain, or to exorcise
passions which the imaginations inflamed. All
this was based on penance,—self-expiation,—which
entered so largely into the theogonies of the East,
and which gave a gloomy form to the piety of the Middle
Ages. This error was among the first to kindle
the fiery protests of Luther. The repudiation
of this error, and of its logical sequences, was one
of the causes of the Reformation. This error cast