Beacon Lights of History, Volume 03 eBook

John Lord
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 284 pages of information about Beacon Lights of History, Volume 03.

Beacon Lights of History, Volume 03 eBook

John Lord
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 284 pages of information about Beacon Lights of History, Volume 03.

“Obligations contracted re—­by the intervention of things—­are called by the moderns real contracts, because they are not perfected till something has passed from one party to another.  Of this description are the contracts of loan, deposit, and pledge,—­security for indebtedness.  Till the subject is actually lent, deposited, or pledged, it does not form the special contract of loan, deposit, or pledge.”

Next to the perfection of contracts by re,—­the intervention of things,—­were obligations contracted by verbis, spoken words, and by literis, or writings.  The verborum obligatio was contracted by uttering certain words of formal style,—­an interrogation being put by one party, and an answer given by the other.  These stipulations were binding.  In England all guarantees must be in writing.

The obligatio literis was a written acknowledgment of debt, chiefly employed when money was borrowed; but the creditor could not sue upon a note within two years from its date, without being called upon also to prove that the money was in fact paid to the debtor.

Contracts perfected by consent, consensu, had reference to sale, hiring; partnership, and mandate, or orders to be carried out by agents.  All contracts of sale were good without writing.

Acts which caused damage to another opened a new class of cases.  The law obliged the wrong-doer to make reparation, and this responsibility extended to damages arising not only from positive acts, but from negligence or imprudence.  In cases of libel or slander, the truth of the allegation might be pleaded in justification.  In all cases it was necessary to show that an injury had been committed maliciously; but if damage arose in the exercise of a right, as killing a slave in self-defence, no claim for reparation could be maintained.  If any one exercised a profession or trade for which he was not qualified, he was liable to all the damage his want of skill or knowledge might occasion,—­a provision that some of our modern laws might advantageously revive.  When any damage was done by a slave or an animal, the owner of the same was liable for the loss, though the mischief was done without his knowledge and against his will.  If anything was thrown from a window giving on the public thoroughfare so as to injure any one by the fall, the occupier was bound to repair the damage, though done by a stranger.  Legal claims might be transferred to a third person by sale, exchange, or donation; but to prevent speculators from purchasing debts at low prices, it was ordered that the assignee should not be entitled to exact from the debtor more than he himself had paid to acquire the debt, with interest,—­a wise and just regulation.

By the ancient constitution, the king had the prerogative of determining civil causes.  The right then devolved on the consuls, afterward on the praetor, and in certain cases on the curule and plebeian ediles, who were charged with the internal police of the city.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Beacon Lights of History, Volume 03 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.