can be approached two ways, and has its front entrance
opposite a small street, which has not yet received
any name at all. To a stranger, ingress to the
building is rather perplexing. A gateway in Lancaster-road,
leading to a footpath, fringed with rockery, would
appear to be the front way, but it is only a rear
road, and when you get fairly upon it you wonder where
it will end— whether you will be able to
get to the interior by it, or only to some rails on
one side and a wall on the other. It, however,
eventuates round a corner, at the main entrance.
We recommend this back way, for the legitimate front
road is much more intricate and harassing; you can
only become acquainted with it, if topographically
unenlightened, and bashful as to making inquiries,
by hovering about an ancient windmill, moving up narrow
hilly streets, flanked by angular bye-paths, and then
following either the first woman you see with a prayer
book in her hand, or the first man you catch a sight
of with a good coat on his back. The main entrance
is ornamental but diminutive in many respects.
There are three doorways here, the collateral ones,
which are very low, and quite calculated to prevent
people from entering the building with their hats
on, being patronised the most—not because
there is an offertory box in the central passage,
but because the side roads are the handiest.
During a second visit to the church we went in by the
middle door, the medium course, as the proverb hath
it, being the safest, and seeing the offertory box—a
remarkably strong, iron-cornered article, fastened
to the wall—we remarked to an official,
in his shirt sleeves, who was with us, “This
will stand a deal of money before falling.”
The official replied “It will so,” and
the look, he gave us superinduced the conclusion that
the offertory box was not going to fall for some time.
We have seen no more deceptive-looking church than
that we are now at. Viewed externally, you would
say that scarcely a good handful of people could be
accommodated in it; it seems so narrow, so entirely
made up of and filled in with stone, that one infers
at first sight it will hardly hold the parson and
the sacrament-loving “old woman” who invariably
exists as a permanent arrangement at all our places
of worship; but this is a fallacy, for the building
will accommodate about 1,100 people. The interior
consists of a nave, two aisles, and a chancel.
Everything in the building seems strong, clean, and
good; and considering the ponderous character of its
architecture a fair share of light is admitted to
it. At the entrance, there is a glass screen,
ornamentally got up and surmounted with a small lion
and unicorn design. Just within this screen there
is a curtained pew, and sitting within its enclosure
must be a very snug and select thing. It is occupied
by Mr. Hermon, M.P., and when he draws the curtains
all round—“he sometimes does,”
said the official accompanying us—no one
can see a morsel of him whilst he can see never a