“Yes, but that is not the worst of it,” Thorndyke continued.  “The moment John Bellingham dies, his dead body has come into existence; and it is ‘deposited’ for the time being, wherever he happens to have died.  But unless he should happen to have died in one of the places of burial mentioned—­which is in the highest degree unlikely—­his body will be, for the time being, ‘deposited’ in some place other than those specified.  In that case clause two is—­for the time being—­not complied with, and consequently George Hurst becomes, automatically, the co-executor.

“But will George Hurst carry out the provisions of clause two?  Probably not.  Why should he?  The will contains no instructions to that effect.  It throws the whole duty on Godfrey.  On the other hand, if he should carry out clause two, what happens?  He ceases to be an executor and he loses a legacy of some seventy thousand pounds.  We may be pretty certain that he will do nothing of the kind.  So that, on considering the two clauses, we see that the wishes of the testator could only be carried out in the unlikely event of his dying in one of the burial-places mentioned, or his body being conveyed immediately after death to a public mortuary in one of the said parishes.  In any other event, it is virtually certain that he will be buried in some place other than that which he desired, and that his brother will be left absolutely without provision or recognition.”

“John Bellingham could never have intended that,” I said.

“Clearly not,” agreed Thorndyke; “the provisions of the will furnish internal evidence that he did not.  You note that he bequeathed five thousand pounds to George Hurst, in the event of clause two being carried out; but he has made no bequest to his brother in the event of its not being carried out.  Obviously, he had not entertained the possibility of this contingency at all.  He assumed, as a matter of course, that the conditions of clause two would be fulfilled, and regarded the conditions themselves as a mere formality.”

“But,” Jervis objected, “Jellicoe must have seen the danger of a miscarriage and pointed it out to his client.”

“Exactly,” said Thorndyke.  “There is the mystery.  We understand that he objected strenuously, and that John Bellingham was obdurate.  Now it is perfectly understandable that a man should adhere obstinately to the most stupid and perverse disposition of his property; but that a man should persist in retaining a particular form of words after it has been proved to him that the use of such form will almost certainly result in the defeat of his own wishes; that, I say, is a mystery that calls for very careful consideration.”

“If Jellicoe had been an interested party,” said Jervis, “one would have suspected him of lying low.  But the form of clause two doesn’t affect him at all.”

“No,” said Thorndyke; “the person who stands to profit by the muddle is George Hurst.  But we understand that he was unacquainted with the terms of the will, and there is certainly nothing to suggest that he is in any way responsible for it.”