“Just consider the conditions.  John Bellingham was known to be setting out alone upon a journey beyond the sea.  His exact destination was not stated.  He was to be absent for an undetermined period, but at least three weeks.  His disappearance would occasion no comment; his absence would lead to no inquiries, at least for several weeks, during which the murderer would have leisure quietly to dispose of the body and conceal all traces of the crime.  The conditions were, from a murderer’s point of view, ideal.

“But that was not all.  During that very period of John Bellingham’s absence Mr. Jellicoe was engaged to deliver to the British Museum what was admittedly a dead human body; and that body was to be enclosed in a sealed case.  Could any more perfect or secure method of disposing of a body be devised by the most ingenious murderer?  The plan would have had only one weak point:  the mummy would be known to have left Queen Square after the disappearance of John Bellingham, and suspicion might in the end have arisen.  To this point I shall return presently; meanwhile we will consider the second hypothesis—­that the missing man was made away with by Mr. Hurst.

“Now, there seemed to be no doubt that some person, purporting to be John Bellingham, did actually visit Mr. Hurst’s house; and he must either have left that house or remained in it.  If he left, he did so surreptitiously; if he remained, there could be no reasonable doubt that he had been murdered and that his body had been concealed.  Let us consider the probabilities in each case.

“Assuming—­as everyone seems to have done—­that the visitor was really John Bellingham, we are dealing with a responsible, middle-aged gentleman, and the idea that such a person would enter a house, announce his intention of staying, and then steal away unobserved is very difficult to accept.  Moreover, he would appear to have come down to Eltham by rail immediately on landing in England, leaving his luggage in the cloak-room at Charing Cross.  This pointed to a definiteness of purpose quite inconsistent with his casual disappearance from the house.

“On the other hand, the idea that he might have been murdered by Hurst was not inconceivable.  The thing was physically possible.  If Bellingham had really been in the study when Hurst came home, the murder could have been committed—­by appropriate means—­and the body temporarily concealed in the cupboard or elsewhere.  But, although possible, it was not at all probable.  There was no real opportunity.  The risk and the subsequent difficulties would be very great; there was not a particle of positive evidence that a murder had occurred; and the conduct of Hurst in immediately leaving the house in possession of the servants is quite inconsistent with the supposition that there was a body concealed in it.  So that, while it is almost impossible to believe that John Bellingham left the house of his own accord, it is equally difficult to believe that he did not leave it.