The emancipation of mankind from obsolete theories and formularies may be accompanied by great tides of moral and emotional release among types and strata that by the standards of a trained and explicit intellectual, may seem spiritually hopeless.  It is not necessary to imagine the whole world critical and lucid in order to imagine the whole world unified in religious sentiment, comprehending the same phrases and coming together regardless of class and race and quality, in the worship and service of the true God.  The coming kingship of God if it is to be more than hieratic tyranny must have this universality of appeal.  As the head grows clear the body will turn in the right direction.  To the mass of men modern religion says, “This is the God it has always been in your nature to apprehend.”

11.  God and the love and status of women

Now that we are discussing the general question of individual conduct, it will be convenient to take up again and restate in that relationship, propositions already made very plainly in the second and third chapters.  Here there are several excellent reasons for a certain amount of deliberate repetition. . . .

All the mystical relations of chastity, virginity, and the like with religion, those questions of physical status that play so large a part in most contemporary religions, have disappeared from modern faith.  Let us be as clear as possible upon this.  God is concerned by the health and fitness and vigour of his servants; we owe him our best and utmost; but he has no special concern and no special preferences or commandments regarding sexual things.

Christ, it is manifest, was of the modern faith in these matters, he welcomed the Magdalen, neither would he condemn the woman taken in adultery.  Manifestly corruption and disease were not to stand between him and those who sought God in him.  But the Christianity of the creeds, in this as in so many respects, does not rise to the level of its founder, and it is as necessary to repeat to-day as though the name of Christ had not been ascendant for nineteen centuries, that sex is a secondary thing to religion, and sexual status of no account in the presence of God.  It follows quite logically that God does not discriminate between man and woman in any essential things.  We leave our individuality behind us when we come into the presence of God.  Sex is not disavowed but forgotten.  Just as one’s last meal is forgotten—­which also is a difference between the religious moment of modern faith and certain Christian sacraments.  You are a believer and God is at hand to you; heed not your state; reach out to him and he is there.  In the moment of religion you are human; it matters not what else you are, male or female, clean or unclean, Hebrew or Gentile, bond or free.  It is after the moment of religion that we become concerned about our state and the manner in which we use ourselves.