[87] Mr. Burke.  See ante, ii. 222, 285, note 3, and iii. 45.

[88] If due attention were paid to this observation, there would be more virtue, even in politicks.  What Dr. Johnson justly condemned, has, I am sorry to say, greatly increased in the present reign.  At the distance of four years from this conversation, 21st February, 1777, My Lord Archbishop of York, in his ’sermon before the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts,’ thus indignantly describes the then state of parties:—­’Parties once had a principle belonging to them, absurd perhaps, and indefensible, but still carrying a notion of duty, by which honest minds might easily be caught.  ’But there are now combinations of individuals, who, instead of being the sons and servants of the community, make a league for advancing their private interests.  It is their business to hold high the notion of political honour.  I believe and trust, it is not injurious to say, that such a bond is no better than that by which the lowest and wickedest combinations are held together; and that it denotes the last stage of political depravity.’  To find a thought, which just shewed itself to us from the mind of Johnson, thus appearing again at such a distance of time, and without any communication between them, enlarged to full growth in the mind of Markham, is a curious object of philosophical contemplation.—­That two such great and luminous minds should have been so dark in one corner,—­that they should have held it to be ’Wicked rebellion in the British subjects established in America, to resist the abject condition of holding all their property at the mercy of British subjects remaining at home, while their allegiance to our common Lord the King was to be preserved inviolate,—­is a striking proof to me, either that ‘He who sitteth in Heaven’ [Psalms, ii.4] scorns the loftiness of human pride,—­or that the evil spirit, whose personal existence I strongly believe, and even in this age am confirmed in that belief by a Fell, nay, by a Hurd, has more power than some choose to allow.  BOSWELL.  Horace Walpole writing on June 10, 1778, after censuring Robertson for sneering at Las Casas, continues:—­’Could Archbishop Markham in a Sermon before the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel by fire and sword paint charity in more contemptuous terms?  It is a Christian age.’ Letters, vii.81.  It was Archbishop Markham to whom Johnson made the famous bow; ante, vol. iv, just before April 10, 1783.  John Fell published in 1779 Demoniacs; an Enquiry into the Heathen and Scripture Doctrine of Daemons.  For Hurd see ante, under June 9,1784.

[89] See Forster’s Essays, ii 304-9.  Mr. Forster often quotes Cooke in his Life of Goldsmith.  He describes him (i. 58) as ’a young Irish law student who had chambers near Goldsmith in the temple.’  Goldsmith did not reside in the temple till 1763 (ib. p.336), and Cooke was old enough to have published his Hesiod in 1728, and to have found a place in The Dunciad (ii. 138).  See Elwin and Courthope’s Pope, x. 212, for his correspondence with Pope.