with him before, although he lived nearly a century earlier.  And when we think of the superstitious fear and monkish prejudice with which the great invention of printing was at first regarded, such a confusion of two persons of similar name, and both, in the eyes of a dark age, servants of Satan, cannot surprise us.  Our John Faustus was also sometimes confounded with two younger contemporaries, one of whom was called Faustus Socinus, and made Poland the chief theatre of his operations; the other, George Sabellicus, expressly named himself Faustus Junior, also Faustus Minor.  Both were celebrated necromancers and astrologers, who probably availed themselves of the advantage derived from the adoption of the famous name of Faustus.[1]

A second attempt to prove the historical nonentity of Dr. Faustus was made at Wittenberg, in the year 1683.  Some of his popular biographers had claimed for him a professorship at that celebrated university, or at least brought him into connection with it,—­a pretension which the actual professors of that learned institution thought rather prejudicial to their honor, and which they were desirous of seeing refuted.  Stimulated, as it would seem, by a zeal of this kind, J.G.  Neumann wrote a “Dissertatio de Fausto Praestigiatore,” in which he not only tried to prove that Dr. Faustus had never been at Wittenberg, but pronounced his whole story fabulous.  An attempt like this would not surprise us in our own time, the age of historical skepticism; but the seventeenth century gave credit to narratives having much slighter foundation.  Although this dissertation was full of historical mistakes and erroneous statements, it made some sensation, as is proved by its four successive editions.  It was also translated into German.  All Neumann’s endeavors, however, could not stand against the testimony of contemporaries, who partly had known Faustus personally, partly had heard of him from living witnesses, and allude to his death as an occurrence of recent date.

John Faustus, or rather, after the German form of his name, Faust, was born in the last quarter of the fifteenth century, probably not before the year 1490.  According to the oldest “Volksbuch” (People’s Book) which bears his name,[2] his parents then lived at Roda, in the present Duchy of Saxe-Weimar.  The same place is likewise named as his native village by G.R.  Widmann, his first regular biographer, who says that his father was a peasant.[3] Although these two works are the foundation of the great number of later ones referring to the same subject, some of these latter deviate with respect to Faustus’s birthplace.  J.N.  Pfitzer, for instance, who, seventy years after Widmann, published a revised and much altered edition of his book, makes Faust see the light at Saltwedel, a small town belonging then to the principality of Anhalt, and must have had his reasons for this amendment.  A confusion of this kind may, indeed, have early arisen from a change