planters chose to attribute it to the Registry Bill
now mentioned. They gave out also, that the slaves
in Jamaica and in the other islands had imbibed a
notion, that this Bill was to lead to their emancipation;
that, while this notion existed, their minds would
be in an unsettled state; and therefore that it was
necessary that it should be done away.
Accordingly on the 19th day of June 1816, they moved
and procured an address from the Commons to the Prince
Regent, the substance of which was (as relates to
this particular) that “His Royal Highness would
be pleased to order all the governors of the West
India islands to proclaim, in the most public manner,
His Royal Highness’s concern and surprise at
the false and mischievous opinion, which appeared to
have prevailed in some of the British colonies,—that
either His Royal Highness or the British Parliament
had sent out orders for the emancipation of
the Negroes; and to direct the most effectual methods
to be adopted for discountenancing these unfounded
and dangerous impressions.” Here then
we have a proof “that in the month of June 1816
the planters had no notion of altering the condition
of their Negroes.” It is also evident,
that they have entertained no such notion since;
for emancipation implies a preparation of the
persons who are to be the subjects of so great a change.
It implies a previous alteration of treatment for
the better, and a previous alteration of customs and
even of circumstances, no one of which can however
be really and truly effected without a previous
change of the laws. In fact, a progressively
better treatment by law must have been settled
as a preparatory and absolutely necessary work, had
emancipation been intended. But as we
have never heard of the introduction of any new laws
to this effect, or with a view of producing this effect,
in any of our colonies, we have an evidence, almost
as clear as the sun at noonday, that our planters
have no notion of altering the condition of their
Negroes, though fifteen years have elapsed since the
abolition of the slave trade. But if it be true
that the abolition of the slave trade has not produced
all the effects, which the abolitionists anticipated
or intended, it would appear to be their duty, unless
insurmountable obstacles present themselves, to
resume their labours: for though there may be
upon the whole, as I have admitted, a somewhat better
individual treatment of the slaves by their
masters, arising out of an increased prudence in same,
which has been occasioned by stopping the importations,
yet it is true, that not only many of the former continue
to be ill-treated by the latter, but that all may
be so ill-treated, if the latter be so disposed.
They may be ill-fed, hard-worked, ill-used, and wantonly
and barbarously punished. They may be tortured,
nay even deliberately and intentionally killed without
the means of redress, or the punishment of the aggressor,