in them, who are not able to sustain a conversation.  Those who know Menage only by his books, might think he resembled those learned men; but if you shew the MENAGIANA, you distinguish him from them, and make him known by a talent which is given to very few learned men.  There it appears that he was a man who spoke off-hand a thousand good things.  His memory extended to what was ancient and modern; to the court and to the city; to the dead and to the living languages; to things serious and things jocose; in a word, to a thousand sorts of subjects.  That which appeared a trifle to some readers of the Menagiana, who did not consider circumstances, caused admiration in other readers, who minded the difference between what a man speaks without preparation, and that which he prepares for the press.  And, therefore, we cannot sufficiently commend the care which his illustrious friends took to erect a monument so capable of giving him immortal glory.  They were not obliged to rectify what they had heard him say; for, in so doing, they had not been faithful historians of his conversations.’  BOSWELL.  Boswell’s quotation from Clarendon (ed. 1826, iv. 242) differs somewhat from the original.

[1297] See ante, ii. 326, and iv. 236.

[1298] See ante, p. iii.

[1299] To this finely-drawn character we may add the noble testimony of Sir Joshua Reynolds:—­’His pride had no meanness in it; there was nothing little or mean about him.’  Taylor’s Reynolds, ii. 457.

[1300] In Johnson’s character of Boerhaave there is much that applies equally well to himself.  ’Thus died Boerhaave, a man formed by nature for great designs, and guided by religion in the exertion of his abilities.  He was of a robust and athletick constitution of body, so hardened by early severities and wholesome fatigue that he was insensible of any sharpness of air, or inclemency of weather.  He was tall, and remarkable for extraordinary strength.  There was in his air and motion something rough and artless, but so majestick and great at the same time, that no man ever looked upon him without veneration, and a kind of tacit submission to the superiority of his genius....  He was never soured by calumny and detraction, nor ever thought it necessary to confute them; “for they are sparks,” said he, “which, if you do not blow them, will go out of themselves."...  He was not to be overawed or depressed by the presence, frowns, or insolence of great men; but persisted, on all occasions, in the right with a resolution always present and always calm....  Nor was he unacquainted with the art of recommending truth by elegance, and embellishing the philosopher with polite literature....  He knew the importance of his own writings to mankind, and lest he might by a roughness and barbarity of style, too frequent among men of great learning, disappoint his own intentions, and make his labours less useful, he did not neglect the politer arts of eloquence and poetry.  Thus was his learning at once various and exact, profound and agreeable....  He asserted on all occasions the divine authority and sacred efficacy of the holy Scriptures; and maintained that they alone taught the way of salvation, and that they only could give peace of mind.’  Johnson’s Works, vi. 288.