[1278] It is not yet published.—­In a letter to me, Mr. Agutter says, ’My sermon before the University was more engaged with Dr. Johnson’s moral than his intellectual character.  It particularly examined his fear of death, and suggested several reasons for the apprehension of the good, and the indifference of the infidel in their last hours; this was illustrated by contrasting the death of Dr. Johnson and Mr. Hume:  the text was Job xxi. 22-26.’  BOSWELL.  It was preached on July 23, 1786, and not at Johnson’s death.  It is entitled On the Difference between the Deaths of the Righteous and the Wicked.  Illustrated in the Instance of Dr. Samuel Johnson and David Hume, Esq. The text is from Job xxi. 23 (not 22)-26.  It was published in 1800.  Neither Johnson nor Hume is mentioned in the sermon itself by name.  Its chief, perhaps its sole, merit is its brevity.

[1279] See ante, ii. 335, and iii. 375.

[1280] ’May 26, 1791.  After the Doctor’s death, Burke, Sir Joshua Reynolds, and Boswell sent an ambling circular-letter to me begging subscriptions for a monument for him.  I would not deign to write an answer; but sent down word by my footman, as I would have done to parish officers, with a brief, that I would not subscribe.’  Horace Walpole’s Letters, ix. 319.  In Malone’s correspondence are complaints of the backwardness of the members of the Literary Club ’to pay the amounts nominally subscribed by them.’  Prior’s Goldsmith, ii. 226.

[1281] It was, says Malone, owing to Reynolds that the monument was erected in St. Paul’s.  In his Journey to Flandershe had lamented that sculpture languished in England, and was almost confined to monuments to eminent men.  But even in these it had not fair play, for Westminster Abbey was so full, that the recent monuments appeared ridiculous being stuck up in odd holes and corners.  On the other hand St. Paul’s looked forlorn and desolate.  Here monuments should be erected, under the direction of the Royal Academy.  He took advantage of Johnson’s death to make a beginning with the plan which he had here sketched, and induced his friends to give up their intention of setting up the monument in the Abbey.  Reynolds’s Works, ed. 1824, ii. 248.  ’He asked Dr. Parr—­but in vain—­to include in the epitaph Johnson’s title of Professor of Ancient Literature to the Royal Academy; as it was on this pretext that he persuaded the Academicians to subscribe a hundred guineas.’  Johnstone’s Parr, iv. 686.  See ante, ii. 239, where the question was raised whose monument should be first erected in St. Paul’s, and Johnson proposed Milton’s.

[1282] The Reverend Dr. Parr, on being requested to undertake it, thus expressed himself in a letter to William Seward, Esq.: 

’I leave this mighty task to some hardier and some abler writer.  The variety and splendour of Johnson’s attainments, the peculiarities of his character, his private virtues, and his literary publications, fill me with confusion and dismay, when I reflect upon the confined and difficult species of composition, in which alone they can be expressed, with propriety, upon his monument.’