sometimes it is couched in a bold scheme of speech, in a tart irony, in a lusty hyperbole, in a startling metaphor, in a plausible reconciling of contradictions, or in acute nonsense:  sometimes a scenical representation of persons or things, a counterfeit speech, a mimical look or gesture, passeth for it:  sometimes an affected simplicity, sometimes a presumptuous bluntness giveth it being:  sometimes it riseth only from a lucky hitting upon what is strange:  sometimes from a crafty wresting obvious matter to the purpose.  Often it consisteth in one knows not what, and springeth up one can hardly tell how.  Its ways are unaccountable, and inexplicable; being answerable to the numberless rovings of fancy, and windings of language.  It is, in short, a manner of speaking out of the simple and plain way, (such as reason teacheth and proveth things by,) which by a pretty surprising uncouthness in conceit or expression, doth affect and amuse the fancy, stirring in it some wonder, and breeding some delight thereto.  It raiseth admiration, as signifying a nimble sagacity of apprehension, a special felicity of invention, a vivacity of spirit, and reach of wit more than vulgar; it seeming to argue a rare quickness of parts, that one can fetch in remote conceits applicable; a notable skill, that he can dextrously accommodate them to the purpose before him; together with a lively briskness of humour, not apt to damp those sportful flashes of imagination. (Whence in Aristotle such persons are termed [Greek:  hepidexioi], dextrous men, and [Greek:  eustrophoi], men of facile or versatile manners, who can easily turn themselves to all things, or turn all things to themselves.) It also procureth delight, by gratifying curiosity with its rareness, as semblance of difficulty:  (as monsters, not for their beauty, but their rarity; as juggling tricks, not for their use, but their abstruseness, are beheld with pleasure:) by diverting the mind from its road of serious thoughts; by instilling gaiety and airiness of spirit; by provoking to such dispositions of spirit in way of emulation or complaisance; and by seasoning matters, otherwise distasteful or insipid, with an unusual and thence grateful tang.’  BOSWELL.  Morris’s Essay was published in 1744.  Hume wrote:—­’Pray do you not think that a proper dedication may atone for what is objectionable in my Dialogues’!  I am become much of my friend Corbyn Morrice’s mind, who says that he writes all his books for the sake of the dedications.’  J. H. Burton’s Hume, ii. 147.

[344] The quarrel arose from the destruction by George II. of George I.’s will (ante, ii. 342).  The King of Prussia, Frederick the Great, was George I.’s grandson.  ’Vague rumours spoke of a large legacy to the Queen of Prussia [Frederick’s mother].  Of that bequest demands were afterwards said to have been frequently and roughly made by her son, the great King of Prussia, between whom and his uncle subsisted much inveteracy.’  Walpole’s Letters, i. cxx.