“[Greek:  En makaressi ponon antaxios ein amoibae].” 
Johnstone’s Life of Parr, iv. 713.

Though the inscription on the scroll is not strictly speaking part of the epitaph, yet this mixture of Greek and Latin is open to the censure Johnson passed on Pope’s Epitaph on Craggs.

‘It may be proper to remark,’ he said, ’the absurdity of joining in the same inscription Latin and English, or verse and prose.  If either language be preferable to the other, let that only be used; for no reason can be given why part of the information should be given in one tongue and part in another on a tomb more than in any other place, or on any other occasion.’  Johnson’s Works, viii. 353.

Bacon the sculptor was anxious, wrote Malone, ’that posterity should know that he was entitled to annex R.A. to his name.’  Parr was ready to give his name, lest if it were omitted ’Bacon should slily put the figure of a hog on Johnson’s monument’; just as ’Saurus and Batrachus, when Octavia would not give them leave to set their names on the Temples they had built in Rome, scattered one of them [Greek:  saurai] [lizards], and the other [Greek:  batrachoi] [frogs] on the bases and capitals of the columns.’  But as for the R.A., the sculptor ’very reluctantly had to agree to its omission.’  Johnstone’s Parr, iv. 705 and 710.

FOOTNOTES: 

[1] Nothing can compensate for this want this year of all years.  Johnson’s health was better than it had been for long, and his mind happier perhaps than it had ever been.  The knowledge that in his Lives of the Poets, he had done, and was doing good work, no doubt was very cheering to him.  At no time had he gone more into society, and at no time does he seem to have enjoyed it with greater relish.  ’How do you think I live?’ he wrote on April 25.  ’On Thursday, I dined with Hamilton, and went thence to Mrs. Ord.  On Friday, with much company at Reynolds’s.  On Saturday, at Dr. Bell’s.  On Sunday, at Dr. Burney’s; at night, came Mrs. Ord, Mr. Greville, &c.  On Monday with Reynolds, at night with Lady Lucan; to-day with Mr. Langton; to-morrow with the Bishop of St. Asaph; on Thursday with Mr. Bowles; Friday ——­; Saturday, at the Academy; Sunday with Mr. Ramsay.’ Piozzi Letters, ii. 107.  On May 1, he wrote:—­’At Mrs. Ord’s, I met one Mrs. B——­ [Buller], a travelled lady, of great spirit, and some consciousness of her own abilities.  We had a contest of gallantry an hour long, so much to the diversion of the company that at Ramsay’s last night, in a crowded room, they would have pitted us again.  There were Smelt, [one of the King’s favourites] and the Bishop of St. Asaph, who comes to every place; and Lord Monboddo, and Sir Joshua, and ladies out of tale.’ Ib. p. 111.  The account that Langton gives of the famous evening at Mrs. Vesey’s, ’when the company began to collect round Johnson till they became not less than four, if not five deep (ante, May 2, 1780), is lively enough; but ‘the particulars of the conversation’ which he neglects, Boswell would have given us in full.