In the London Magazine this essay had the following postscript:—­

“P.S.—­A writer, whose real name, it seems, is Boldero, but who has been entertaining the town for the last twelve months, with some very pleasant lucubrations, under the assumed signature of Leigh Hunt[1], in his Indicator, of the 31st January last, has thought fit to insinuate, that I Elia do not write the little sketches which bear my signature, in this Magazine; but that the true author of them is a Mr. L——­b.  Observe the critical period at which he has chosen to impute the calumny!—­on the very eve of the publication of our last number—­affording no scope for explanation for a full month—­during which time, I must needs lie writhing and tossing, under the cruel imputation of nonentity.—­Good heavens! that a plain man must not be allowed to be—­

    “They call this an age of personality:  but surely this spirit of
    anti-personality (if I may so express it) is something worse.

    “Take away my moral reputation:  I may live to discredit that
    calumny.

    “Injure my literary fame,—­I may write that up again—­

    “But when a gentleman is robbed of his identity, where is he?

“Other murderers stab but at our existence, a frail and perishing trifle at the best.  But here is an assassin who aims at our very essence; who not only forbids us to be any longer, but to have been at all.  Let our ancestors look to it—­

“Is the parish register nothing?  Is the house in Princes-street, Cavendish-square, where we saw the light six-and-forty years ago, nothing?  Were our progenitors from stately Genoa, where we flourished four centuries back, before the barbarous name of Boldero[2] was known to a European mouth, nothing?  Was the goodly scion of our name, transplanted into England, in the reign of the seventh Henry, nothing?  Are the archives of the steel yard, in succeeding reigns (if haply they survive the fury of our envious enemies) showing that we flourished in prime repute, as merchants, down to the period of the commonwealth, nothing?

      “Why then the world, and all that’s in’t is nothing—­
      The covering sky is nothing, Bohemia is nothing.—­

    “I am ashamed that this trifling writer should have power to move
    me so.”

Leigh Hunt, in The Indicator, January 31 and February 7, 1821, had reprinted from The Examiner a review of Lamb’s Works, with a few prefatory remarks in which it was stated:  “We believe we are taking no greater liberty with him [Charles Lamb] than our motives will warrant, when we add that he sometimes writes in the London Magazine under the signature of Elia.”