Jack had two voices,—­both plausible, hypocritical, and insinuating; but his secondary or supplemental voice still more decisively histrionic than his common one.  It was reserved for the spectator; and the dramatis personas were supposed to know nothing at all about it.  The lies of young Wilding, and the sentiments in Joseph Surface, were thus marked out in a sort of italics to the audience.  This secret correspondence with the company before the curtain (which is the bane and death of tragedy) has an extremely happy effect in some kinds of comedy, in the more highly artificial comedy of Congreve or of Sheridan especially, where the absolute sense of reality (so indispensable to scenes of interest) is not required, or would rather interfere to diminish your pleasure.  The fact is, you do not believe in such characters as Surface—­the villain of artificial comedy—­even while you read or see them.  If you did, they would shock and not divert you.  When Ben, in Love for Love, returns from sea, the following exquisite dialogue occurs at his first meeting with his father—­

Sir Sampson. Thou hast been many a weary league, Ben, since I saw thee.

Ben. Ey, ey, been!  Been far enough, an that be all.—­Well, father, and how do all at home? how does brother Dick, and brother Val?

Sir Sampson. Dick! body o’ me, Dick has been dead these two years.  I writ you word when you were at Leghorn.

Ben. Mess, that’s true; Marry, I had forgot.  Dick’s dead, as you say—­Well, and how?—­I have a many questions to ask you—­

Here is an instance of insensibility which in real life would be revolting, or rather in real life could not have co-existed with the warm-hearted temperament of the character.  But when you read it in the spirit with which such playful selections and specious combinations rather than strict metaphrases of nature should be taken, or when you saw Bannister play it, it neither did, nor does wound the moral sense at all.  For what is Ben—­the pleasant sailor which Bannister gives us—­but a piece of satire—­a creation of Congreve’s fancy—­a dreamy combination of all the accidents of a sailor’s character—­his contempt of money—­his credulity to women—­with that necessary estrangement from home which it is just within the verge of credibility to suppose might produce such an hallucination as is here described.  We never think the worse of Ben for it, or feel it as a stain upon his character.  But when an actor comes, and instead of the delightful phantom—­the creature dear to half-belief—­which Bannister exhibited—­displays before our eyes a downright concretion of a Wapping sailor—­a jolly warm-hearted Jack Tar—­and nothing else—­when instead of investing it with a delicious confusedness of the head, and a veering undirected goodness of purpose—­he gives to it a downright daylight understanding, and a full consciousness of its actions; thrusting forward the sensibilities of the character with a pretence as if it stood upon nothing else, and was to be judged by them alone—­we feel the discord of the thing; the scene is disturbed; a real man has got in among the dramatis personae, and puts them out.  We want the sailor turned out.  We feel that his true place is not behind the curtain but in the first or second gallery.