The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 21 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 526 pages of information about The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 21.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 21 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 526 pages of information about The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 21.
to be divided among her three allies; and this, despite the fact that but for the activity of the Greek navy in preventing the convoy of Turkey’s best troops from Asia, Bulgaria would never have had her rapid success at the beginning of the war.  Finally, he strenuously objected to the whole seaboard of Macedonia going to Bulgaria, as the population where it was not Moslem was chiefly Greek.  All the parties to the dispute made much of ethnical and historical claims—­“A thousand years are as a day” in their sight.  The answer of Dr. Daneff to the Greek demands was to the effect that Greece already had one good port on the Mediterranean, while Bulgaria had none, and that Bulgaria would have to spend immense sums on either Kavala or Dedeagatch to make them of any great value.  Moreover, as a result of the war, Greece would get Crete, the Aegean islands, and a good slice of the mainland.  She had suffered least in the war and was really being overpaid for her services.

Behind all these formal contentions were the conflicting ambitions and the racial hatreds which no discussion could effectually resolve.  Bulgaria was determined to secure the hegemony of the Balkan peninsula.  She believed that her role was that of a Balkan Prussia, and her great victories made her confident of her ability to play the role successfully.  To this Servia would never consent.  The Servians far outnumber the Bulgarians.  Were they united under one scepter they would be the strongest nation in the Balkans.  Their policy is to maintain an equilibrium in the peninsula until the hoped-for annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina will give them the preponderance.  This alone would incline Servia to make common cause with Greece.  In addition, she had the powerful motive of direct self-interest.  Since she did not secure the coveted territory on the Adriatic, Salonika would be more than ever the natural outlet for her products.  Should Bulgaria wedge in behind Greece at Salonika, Servia would have two Powers to deal with, each of which could pursue the policy of destroying her commerce by a prohibitory tariff, a policy so often adopted toward her by Austria-Hungary.  M. Pashitch, therefore, was determined to have the new southern boundary of Servia coterminous with the northern boundary of Greece.  Moreover, Greeks and Servians were aware of the relative weakness of the Bulgarians due to their great losses and to the wide territory occupied by their troops.  The war party was in the ascendant in each country.  The Servians were anxious to avenge Slivnitza, and the Greeks still further to redeem themselves from the reputation of 1897.  Had peace been signed in January, there is little doubt that a greater spirit of conciliation would have prevailed.  The Young Turks were universally condemned at that time for refusing to yield; but had they deliberately adopted Abdul Hamid’s policy of playing off one people against another, they could not have succeeded better than by their determination to fight.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 21 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.