was diverted by wars, but the main trend taken by
the course of events was unalterable. The aristocracy,
finding that it was losing ground, made attempts to
reenforce itself with commercial and American wealth,
thereby sacrificing the last traces of its old distinction.
Money might give power of a sort—a dangerous
power in its way—but not-power to recover
the loss of political domination. The South African
War and the attempt to obliterate the resentment it
caused in the country by instituting a campaign for
the revival of Protection brought about the downfall
of the Tory party. The electoral
debacle
of 1906 was the consequence and served as a signal
of alarm in the easy-going Conservative world.
Till then many who were accustomed to hold the reins
of government in their hands, as if by right, had
not fully realized that the control was slipping from
them. The cry went up that socialism and revolution
were imminent.
The Times quoted
The Clarion.
Old fogies shook their heads and declared the country
would be ruined and that a catastrophe was at hand.
But it was soon found, on the contrary, that the government
of the country was in the hands of men of great ability,
enlightenment, and imagination; trade prospered, social
needs were more closely attended to, and, most important
of all, peace was maintained. The House of Commons
had opened its doors to men of moderate means, and
the Labor party, consisting of working men, miners,
and those with first-hand knowledge of industrial
conditions, came into existence as an organized political
force.
The last six years have shown the desperate attempts
of the ancient order to strain every nerve against
the inevitable, and to thwart and destroy the projects
and ambitions of those who represented the new thought
and the new life of the nation. Though apparently
successful at first, the rash action of the Chamber
which still represented the interest, privileges,
and prejudices of the wealthier class and of vested
interests, only helped in the long run to hasten the
day when they were to be deprived of their most formidable
weapon. They still retain considerable power:
their interests are guarded by one of the political
parties, and socially they hold undisputed sway.
In an amazing defense of the past action of the House
of Lords, Lord Lansdowne in 1906 said: “It
is constantly assumed that the House of Lords has
always shown itself obstructive, reluctant, an opponent
to all useful measures for the amelioration of the
condition of the people of this island. Nothing
is further from the truth. You will find that
in the past with which we are concerned the House of
Lords has shown itself not only tolerant of such measures
but anxious to promote them and to make them effectual
to the best of its ability. And that, I believe,
has been, and I am glad to think it, from time immemorial,
the attitude of what I suppose I may call the aristocracy
toward the people of this country” The last