“This bestial behaviour on the part of the civilian population is a breach of Article I., Convention of Geneva,[120] and the principles of military law, as well as the principles of humanity” (p. 4).

[Footnote 120:  Self-proclaimed outlaws cite the law when it suits their purpose!—­Author.]

“The guilt for these transgressions of international law lies largely at the door of the Belgian Government.  The latter has made an attempt to rid itself of responsibility by ascribing the guilt to the rage for destruction in the German troops, who are accused of proceeding to deeds of violence without any reason or ground.[121]

[Footnote 121:  Certainly, just as in Germany in peace time.—­Author.]

“An examining commission has been appointed by the Belgian Government to inquire into the alleged cruelties of German soldiers, and the evidence thus obtained has been made the subject of diplomatic complaints.  This attempt to pervert the truth has absolutely failed.

“The German army is accustomed to wage war against hostile troops, but not against peaceful citizens.[122] Investigations conducted by any examining commission whatsoever, can never dispose of the irrefutable fact that German troops were forced by Belgium’s native population to take defensive measures in the interests of self-preservation.

[Footnote 122:  German non-commissioned officers are accustomed to kick and beat German privates, and the behaviour of German soldiers to fellow-subjects is aptly illustrated by Lieutenant Foerster fighting a pitched battle with a lame old cobbler in Zabern.—­Author.]

“The refugees’ tales collected by the Belgian commission and declared by them to be the result of an impartial investigation bear a stamp which makes them unworthy of belief.  According to the nature of things, the commission is not in a position to test the veracity of such rumours or to apprehend the association of events.  Hence, their accusations against the German army are nothing other than base slanders which are completely invalidated by the accompanying documents” (pp. 5-6).

It must be assumed that readers are acquainted with the official publications of the Belgian and French Governments accusing the German army with waging war in an atrocious manner, as well as the report of Lord Bryce’s commission and Professor Morgan’s report in the “Nineteenth Century” for June.  In the above extract the Berlin Government rules them one and all out of court, which is the author’s justification for making no use of their evidence.

Fortunately the Roman Catholic Church of Germany has published a refutation of Germany’s White Book, and surely this authority deserves credence.  The work in question bears the title:  “Der Luegengeist im Voelkerkrieg,” Kriegsmaerchen gesammelt von Bernhard Duhr, S.J. ("The Spirit of Lying in the War of the Nations,” War Legends collected by the Rev. Bernhard Duhr, S.J.).[123] The reverend gentleman castigates all the nations at war with the same offence—­lying.  His work should have permanent value in the literature of war psychology, but he only undertakes to expose German lies, and in his 72-paged booklet he proves to the hilt the charges made in this work.