[Footnote 119:  Richard Grasshoff:  “Belgien’s Schuld” ("Belgium’s Guilt").]

“That the goaded rage of the lower classes found expression in nameless horrors is unfortunately a sorry truth.  The proofs?  We are not in a position to satisfy the desire for sensation with a cabinet of horrors.  The equipment of the German army does not include either the jars or the chemical fluids for preserving hacked-off limbs, hence it is impossible to display exhibits as in a museum.  Our hospitals do not admit the dead.

“If Germany should be compelled to conduct a second campaign against the cultured peoples of Western Europe, then she will not forget to add the above articles to her equipment in any future war against such opponents.  Pitying mother earth covers the murdered victims.”

This eloquent lawyer has overlooked the aid which the art of photography affords, and as the German army was well equipped with cameras, some tangible proofs could still have been procured—­assuming there were any shred of truth in Germany’s accusations.  The Berlin Government has circulated photographs of dum-dum bullets, i.e., English and French bullets with the points cut off.  It is true no statement is offered regarding the time and place of the points being cut off, which leaves us free to believe that captured ammunition was “doctored” in this manner by the Germans themselves.  “Necessity knows no law” is a principle capable of the widest application.

Grasshoff’s work was only published a few months ago, so that he had ample time to collect facts and proofs—­the result is, six detailed cases with the names of his German informants and their regiments.  In each case the “evidence” is of an exceedingly doubtful character; in view of the gravity of the charges, the lack of corroboration (each case is “proved” by one witness alone), and the partisanship of all concerned, we may safely conclude that no court of justice would convict on it.

The same criticism applies to the official White Book, published in June or July of the present year.  Every witness had previously sworn an oath to protect the German flag (der Fahneneid) which precludes the probability of all impartiality in the witness and makes bias (Befangenheit) his simple duty.  Another important factor to be borne in mind is the hysterical, morbid self-importance of the German nation in general, which causes police and members of the German army to shoot or cut down with the sword their own civilians for the most trivial offences, even in times of peace.

The White Book in question contains a six-page introduction stating the charges against Belgian civilians, and three hundred and seventeen pages of sworn evidence of German officers and soldiers taken for the most part in Belgium and France.  A few extracts from the introduction will suffice to make the German side clear.

“Finally, there is not the slightest doubt that Belgian civilians robbed and killed German wounded; in short, mutilated them in a barbarous manner; even women and young girls participated in these atrocities.  Hence German wounded have had their eyes gouged out, noses, ears, fingers and genitals cut off and their bodies cut open; in other cases German soldiers have been poisoned, hanged on trees, or had burning liquids poured on them, causing death in a most terrible form.