was gained, they not infrequently improved it to the
utter destruction of all who had taken part in the
attack. Whichever side were most to blame in
the feud, no quarter was given by either. It was
an internecine war of numbers, ignorance, and anarchy
against science and order. On both sides there
still remained much of the spirit generated in times
when life was less precious than the valour by which
alone it could be held, and preserved through milder
ages by the belief that death was not annihilation—enough
to give to both parties courage to sacrifice their
lives for the victory of their cause and the destruction
of their enemies. But after a few crushing defeats,
the Communists were compelled to sue for peace, and
to cede a large part of their richest territory.
Driven back into their own chaotic misery, deterred
by merciless punishment from further invasion of their
neighbours’ dominions, they had leisure to contrast
their wretched condition with that of those who prospered
under the restored system of private ownership, family
interest, strong, orderly, permanent government, material
and intellectual civilisation. Machinery did for
the new State, into which the seceding societies were
consolidated by the necessity of self-defence, much
more than it had done before Communism declared war
on it. The same envy which, if war had been any
longer possible, would have urged the Communists again
and again to plunder the wealth that contrasted so
forcibly their own increasing poverty, now humbled
them to admire and covet the means which had produced
it. At last, after bitter intestine struggles,
they voluntarily submitted to the rule of their rivals,
and entreated the latter to accept them as subjects
and pupils. Thus in the 39th century order and
property were once more established throughout the
planet.
“But, as I have said, what you call religion
had altogether disappeared—had ceased,
at least as an avowed principle, to affect the ideas
and conduct of society or of individuals. The
re-establishment of peace and order concentrated men’s
energies on the production of material wealth and
the achievement of physical comfort and ease.
Looking forward to nothing after death, they could
only make the best of the short life permitted to
them and do their utmost to lengthen it. In the
assurance of speedy separation, affection became a
source of much more anxiety and sorrow than happiness.
All ties being precarious and their endurance short,
their force became less and less; till the utmost
enjoyment of the longest possible life for himself
became the sole, or almost the sole, animating motive,
the one paramount interest, of each individual.
The equality which logic had established between the
sexes dissolved the family tie. It was impossible
for law to dictate the conditions on which two free
and equal individuals should live together, merely
because they differed in sex. All the State could
do it did; it insisted on a provision for the children.