We have, then, three different hypotheses concerning Robin Hood:  one placing him in the reign of Richard the First, another in that of Henry the Third, and the last under Edward the Second, and all describing him as a political foe to the established government.  To all of these hypotheses there are two very obvious and decisive objections.  The first is, that Robin Hood, as already remarked, is not so much as named in contemporary history.  Whether as the unsubdued leader of the Saxon peasantry, or insurgent against the tyranny of Henry or Edward, it is inconceivable that we should not hear something of him from the chroniclers.  If, as Thierry says, “he had chosen Hereward for his model,” it is unexplained and inexplicable why his historical fate has been so different from that of Hereward.  The hero of the Camp of Refuge fills an ample place in the annals of his day; his achievements are also handed down in a prose romance, which presents many points of resemblance to the ballads of Robin Hood.  It would have been no wonder, if the vulgar legends about Hereward had utterly perished; but it is altogether anomalous that a popular champion[7] who attained so extraordinary a notoriety in song, a man living from one hundred to two hundred and fifty years later than Hereward, should be passed over without one word of notice from any authoritative historian.[8] That this would not be so we are most fortunately able to demonstrate by reference to a real case which furnishes a singularly exact parallel to the present,—­that of the famous outlaw, Adam Gordon.  In the year 1267, says the continuator of Matthew Paris, a soldier by the name of Adam Gordon, who had lost his estates with other adherents of Simon de Montfort, and refused to seek the mercy of the king, established himself with others in like circumstances near a woody and tortuous road between the village of Wilton and the castle of Farnham, from which position he made forays into the country round about, directing his attacks especially against those who were of the king’s party.  Prince Edward had heard much of the prowess and honorable character of this man, and desired to have some personal knowledge of him.  He succeeded in surprising Gordon with a superior force, and engaged him in single combat, forbidding any of his own followers to interfere.  They fought a long time, and the prince was so filled with admiration of the courage and spirit of his antagonist, that he promised him life and fortune on condition of his surrendering.  To these terms Gordon acceded, his estates were restored, and Edward found him ever after an attached and faithful servant.[9] The story is romantic, and yet Adam Gordon was not made the subject of ballads. Caruit vate sacro.  The contemporary historians, however, all have a paragraph for him.  He is celebrated by Wikes, the Chronicle of Dunstaple, the Waverley Annals, and we know not where else besides.