Before these pages are printed it is not unlikely that the news of the fall of Delhi will have reached us.  The troops of the besiegers amounted in the middle of August to about five thousand five hundred men.  Other troops near them, and reinforcements on the way, may by the end of the month have increased their force to ten thousand.  At the last accounts a siege train was expected to arrive on the 3d of September, and an assault might be made very shortly afterwards.  But September is an unhealthy month, and there may be delays. Dehli door ust,—­“Delhi is far off,”—­is a favorite Indian proverb.  But the chances are in favor of its being now in British hands.[1] With its fall the war will be virtually ended,—­for the reconquest of the disturbed territories will be a matter of little difficulty, when undertaken with the aid of the twenty thousand English troops who will arrive in India before the end of the year.

The settlement of the country, after these long disturbances, cannot be expected to take place at once; civil government has been too much interrupted to resume immediately its ordinary operation.  But as this great revolt has had in very small degree the character of a popular rising, and as the vast mass of natives are in general not discontented with the English rule, order will be reestablished with comparative rapidity, and the course of life will before many months resume much of its accustomed aspect.

The struggle of the trained and ambitious classes against the English power will but have served to confirm it.  The revolt overcome, the last great danger menacing English security in India will have disappeared.  England will have learnt much from the trials she has had to pass through, and that essential changes will take place within a few years in the constitution of the Indian government there can be no doubt.  But it is to be remembered that for the past thirty years, English rule in India has been, with all its defects, an enlightened and beneficent rule.  The crimes with which it has been charged, the crimes of which it has been guilty, are small in amount, compared with the good it has effected.  Moreover, they are not the result of inherent vices in the system of government, so much as of the character of exceptional individuals employed to carry out that system, and of the native character itself.—­But on these points we do not propose now to enter.

If the close of this revolt be not stained with retaliating cruelties, if English soldiers remember mercy, then the whole history of this time will be a proud addition to the annals of England.  For though it will display the incompetency and the folly of her governments, it will show how these were remedied by the energy and spirit of individuals; it will tell of the daring and gallantry of her men, of their patient endurance, of their undaunted courage, and it will tell, too, with a voice full of tears, of the sorrows, and of the brave and tender hearts, and of the unshaken religious faith supporting them to the end, of the women who died in the hands of their enemies.  The names of Havelock and Lawrence will be reckoned in the list of England’s worthies, and the story of the garrison of Cawnpore will be treasured up forever among England’s saddest and most touching memories.