had made me a present of one before this; the omission
of which I take to have proceeded only from negligence:
but it is a fault. I could lend him no assistance.
You must know he is just now diverted from the pursuit
of BELL LETTERS by a paradox, which he has heard his
friend Frend [2] (that learned mathematician) maintain,
that the negative quantities of mathematicians were
merae nugae,—things scarcely in
rerum natura, and smacking too much of mystery
for gentlemen of Mr. Frend’s clear Unitarian
capacity. However, the dispute, once set a-going,
has seized violently on George’s pericranick;
and it is necessary for his health that he should
speedily come to a resolution of his doubts.
He goes about teasing his friends with his new mathematics;
he even frantically talks of purchasing Manning’s
Algebra, which shows him far gone, for, to my knowledge,
he has not been master of seven shillings a good time.
George’s pockets and ——’s
brains are two things in nature which do not abhor
a vacuum.... Now, if you could step in, in this
trembling suspense of his reason, and he should find
on Saturday morning, lying for him at the Porter’s
Lodge, Clifford’s Inn.—his safest
address,—Manning’s Algebra, with a
neat manuscriptum in the blank leaf, running thus,
“FROM THE AUTHOR!” it might save his wits
and restore the unhappy author to those studies of
poetry and criticism which are at present suspended,
to the infinite regret of the whole literary world.
N.B.—Dirty books, smeared leaves, and dogs’
ears will be rather a recommendation than otherwise.
N.B.—He must have the book as soon as possible,
or nothing can withhold him from madly purchasing
the book on tick.... Then shall we see him sweetly
restored to the chair of Longinus,—to dictate
in smooth and modest phrase the laws of verse; to
prove that Theocritus first introduced the Pastoral,
and Virgil and Pope brought it to its perfection; that
Gray and Mason (who always hunt in couples in George’s
brain) have shown a great deal of poetical fire in
their lyric poetry; that Aristotle’s rules are
not to be servilely followed, which George has shown
to have imposed great shackles upon modern genius.
His poems, I find, are to consist of two vols., reasonable
octavo; and a third book will exclusively contain
criticisms, in which he asserts he has gone pretty
deeply into the laws of blank verse and rhyme,
epic poetry, dramatic and pastoral ditto,—all
which is to come out before Christmas. But above
all he has touched most deeply upon
the Drama, comparing the English with the modern German
stage, their merits and defects. Apprehending
that his studies (not to mention his turn,
which I take to be chiefly towards the lyrical poetry)
hardly qualified him for these disquisitions, I modestly
inquired what plays he had read. I found by George’s
reply that he had read Shakspeare, but that
was a good while since: he calls him a great
but irregular genius, which I think to be an original