“the town of the Harlings,” etc.,[5]
we have unimpeachable evidence of a time when the
town was regarded as the dwelling-place of a clan.
Indeed, the comparative rarity of the word mark
in English laws, charters, and local names (to which
Professor Stubbs alludes) may be due to the fact that
the word town has precisely the same meaning.
Mark means originally the belt of waste land
encircling the village, and secondarily the village
with its periphery. Town means originally a
hedge or enclosure, and secondarily the spot that is
enclosed: the modern German zaun, a “hedge,”
preserves the original meaning. But traces of
the mark in England are not found in etymology alone.
I have already alluded to the origin of the “common”
in English towns. What is still more important
is that in some parts of England cultivation in common
has continued until quite recently. The local
legislation of the mark appears in the tunscipesmot,—a
word which is simply Old-English for “town-meeting.”
In the shires where the Danes acquired a firm foothold,
the township was often called a “by”; and
it had the power of enacting its own “by-laws”
or town-laws, as New England townships have to-day.
But above all, the assembly of the markmen has left
vestiges of itself in the constitution of the parish
and the manor. The mark or township, transformed
by the process of feudalization, becomes the manor.
The process of feudalization, throughout western Europe
in general, was no doubt begun by the institution
of Benefices, or “grants of Roman provincial
land by the chieftains of the” Teutonic “tribes
which overran the Roman Empire; such grants being conferred
on their associates upon certain conditions, of which
the commonest was military service.” [6] The
feudal regime naturally reached its most complete
development in France, which affords the most perfect
example of a Roman territory overrun and permanently
held in possession by Teutonic conquerors. Other
causes assisted the process, the most potent perhaps
being the chaotic condition of European society during
the break-up of the Carolingian Empire and the Scandinavian
and Hungarian invasions. Land was better protected
when held of a powerful chieftain than when held in
one’s own right; and hence the practice of commendation,
by which free allodial proprietors were transformed
into the tenants of a lord, became fashionable and
was gradually extended to all kinds of estates.
In England the effects of feudalization were different
from what they were in France, but the process was
still carried very far, especially under the Norman
kings. The theory grew up that all the public
land in the kingdom was the king’s waste, and
that all landholders were the king’s tenants.
Similarly in every township the common land was the
lord’s waste and the landholders were the lord’s
tenants. Thus the township became transformed
into the manor. Yet even by such a change as
this the townsmen or tenants of the manor did not in