in the narrative, so that the impression of one voyage only remains upon the mind.  We must therefore always remember the antithesis which exists between them.  Thus, the first voyage was made in one small vessel with a crew of eighteen men, the second with five ships and three hundred men.  The first voyage was undertaken with John Cabot’s own resources, the second with the royal authority to take six ships and their outfit on the same conditions as if for the King’s service.  The first voyage was a private venture, the second an official expedition.  The first voyage extended over three months and was provisioned for that period only; the second was victualled for twelve months and extended over six months at least, for how much longer is not known.  The course of the first voyage was south of Ireland, then for a while north and afterward west, with the pole star on the right hand.  The course of the second, until land was seen, was north, into northern seas, toward the north pole, in the direction of Iceland, to the cape of Labrador, at 58 deg. north latitude.  On the first voyage no ice was reported; on the second the leading features were bergs and floes of ice and long days of arctic summer.  On the first voyage Cabot saw no man; on the second he found people clothed with “beastes skynnes.”  During the whole of the first voyage John Cabot was the commander; on the second voyage he sailed in command, but who brought the expedition home and when it returned are not recorded.  It is not known how or when John Cabot died; and, although the letters-patent for the second voyage were addressed to him alone, his son Sebastian during forty-five years took the whole credit in every subsequent mention of the discovery of America, without any allusion to his father.  This antithesis may throw light upon the suppression of his father’s name in all the statements attributed to or made by Sebastian Cabot.  He may always have had the second voyage in his mind.  His father may have died on the voyage.  He was marvellously reticent about his father.  The only mention which occurs is on the map seen by Hakluyt, and on the map of 1544, supposed, somewhat rashly, to be a transcript of it.  There the discovery is attributed to John Cabot and to Sebastian his son, and that has reference to the first voyage.  From these considerations it would appear that those who place the landfall at Labrador are right; but it is the landfall of the second voyage—­the voyage Sebastian was always talking about—­not the landfall of John Cabot in 1497.

If Sebastian Cabot had not been so much wrapped up in his own vainglory, we might have had a full record of the eventful voyage which revealed to Europe the shores of our Canadian dominion first of all the lands on the continents of the western hemisphere.  Fortunately, however, there resided in London at that time a most intelligent Italian, Raimondo di Soncino, envoy of the Duke of Milan, Ludovico Sforza, one of those despots of the Renaissance who almost atoned