their family, always candidates for the Institute, anxiously inquiring what their chances were, and if he had recommended them to his friends.  It is striking even in this country of functionaries (I think there are more small public employees in France than in any other country) how many applicants there were always for the most insignificant places—­a Frenchman loves a cap with gold braid and gilt buttons on his coat.

All the winter of 1876, which saw the end of the National Assembly and the beginning of a new regime, was an eventful one in parliamentary circles.  I don’t know if the country generally was very much excited about a new constitution and a change of government.  I don’t think the country in France (the small farmers and peasants) are ever much excited about the form of government.  As long as the crops are good and there is no war to take away their sons and able-bodied men, they don’t care, often don’t know, whether a king or an emperor is reigning over them.  They say there are some far-off villages half hidden in the forests and mountains who still believe that a king and a Bourbon is reigning in France.  Something had to be decided; the provisoire could no longer continue; the country could not go on without a settled government.  All the arguments and negotiations of that period have been so often told, that I will not go into any details.  The two centres, centre droit and centre gauche, had everything in their hands as the great moderating elements of the Assembly, but the conflicting claims of the various parties, Legitimist, Orleanist, Bonapartist, and advanced Left, made the question a very difficult one.

W. as a member of the Comite des Trente was very much occupied and preoccupied.  He came back generally very late from Versailles, and, when he did dine at home, either went out again after dinner to some of the numerous meetings at different houses or had people at home.  I think the great majority of deputies were honestly trying to do what they thought best for the country, and when one remembers the names and personalities on both sides—­MacMahon, Broglie, d’Audiffret-Pasquier, Buffet, Dufaure, and Thiers, Casimir Perier, Leon Say, Jules Simon, Jules Ferry, Freycinet, and many others, it is impossible to think that any of those men were animated by any spirit other than love of the country and an ardent desire to see some stable government restored which would enable France to take her place again among the great powers.  Unfortunately the difference of opinion as to the form of government made things very difficult.  Some of the young deputies, just fresh from the war and smarting under a sense of humiliation, were very violent in their abuse of any Royalist and particularly Bonapartist restoration.

[Illustration:  Meeting of officers of the National Assembly, and of delegates of the new Chambers, in the salon of Hercules, palace of Versailles.  From L’Illustration, March 11. 1876.]