Their Eyes Were Watching God | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 7 pages of analysis & critique of Their Eyes Were Watching God.

Their Eyes Were Watching God | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 7 pages of analysis & critique of Their Eyes Were Watching God.
This section contains 1,906 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Henry Louis Gates Jr.

SOURCE: “Why the Mule Bone Debate Goes On,” in Critical Essays on Zora Neale Hurston, edited by Gloria L. Cronin, G. K. Hall & Co., 1998, pp. 225-28.

In the following review, originally published in the New York Times on February 10, 1991, Gates considers Hurston's desire to portray authentic black culture in Mule Bone.

Controversy over the play Mule Bone has existed ever since it was written by Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston in 1930. Not only did an authors' quarrel prevent the play from being produced, but its exclusive use of black folk vernacular has also provoked debate. In 1984, when the play became part of the publishing project of Dr. Henry Louis Gates Jr., the editor of Hurston's complete works, he sent a copy of it to Gregory Mosher, then the artistic director of the Goodman Theater in Chicago. When Mr. Mosher moved to the Lincoln Center Theater in New...

(read more)

This section contains 1,906 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Henry Louis Gates Jr.
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Henry Louis Gates Jr. from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.