Noh | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of Noh.

Noh | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of Noh.
This section contains 8,630 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Makoto Ueda

SOURCE: Ueda, Makoto. “Zeami Motokiyo: Imitation, Yugen, and the Sublime.” In Zeami, Basho, Yeats, Pound: A Study in Japanese and English Poetics, pp. 11-34. London: Mouton & Co., 1965.

In the essay below, Ueda surveys Zeami's theories on effective Nō theater.

A certain Japanese poet, commenting on the difference between the artisan and the artist, once said that the latter always strives to explore and expand the meaning of his art while the former simply tries to fulfil the rules handed down by the tradition. Zeami Motokiyo1 was known to his contemporaries largely as a master artisan, yet we now know him as a rare artist. Born as the eldest son of a great performer, he followed his father's footsteps and came to achieve great fame for his acting, chanting and dancing; his contemporary audience enjoyed his art, quite possibly without knowing what lay behind it. Yet, although we...

(read more)

This section contains 8,630 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Makoto Ueda
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Makoto Ueda from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.